Double-blind is good but open would be better

Volume: 45, Issue: 3, Pages: 16 - 16
Published: Jul 9, 2020
Abstract
Peer review in software engineering is considered, same as for other disciplines, to be a key element of the research process, yet it is often perceived as not to work fully well. To understand the pains and gains in the peer review system, we ran a survey with open and closed questions with the authors and PC members of ICSE 2014/2015/2016. We received 241 responses (29% response rate). 67% of the respondents identified themselves as...
Paper Details
Title
Double-blind is good but open would be better
Published Date
Jul 9, 2020
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
16 - 16
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.