Same same but different: self-citations identified through Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection
Abstract
Self-citation is attracting wide attention in citation analysis research and research evaluation practice. However, the academic community’s views on self-citation are not uniform. If the number of self-citations should be calculated, it is critical to calculate it accurately and unambiguously. However, based on a case study of thirty papers published during 2014 and 2020 by the corresponding author of the study, we find that the numbers of...
Paper Details
Title
Same same but different: self-citations identified through Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection
Published Date
Jun 19, 2020
Journal
Volume
124
Issue
3
Pages
2723 - 2732
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History