Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers
Abstract
Recently, Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019) proposed a new family of indicators, which measure whether a scientific publication is disruptive to a field or tradition of research. Such disruptive influences are characterized by citations to a focal paper, but not its cited references. In this study, we are interested in the question of convergent validity. We used external criteria of newness to examine convergent validity: In the postpublication peer...
Paper Details
Title
Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers
Published Date
Aug 1, 2020
Journal
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
1242 - 1259
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History