A mixed methods case study investigating how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are reported, understood and interpreted in practice
Abstract
While randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide high-quality evidence to guide practice, much routine care is not based upon available RCTs. This disconnect between evidence and practice is not sufficiently well understood. This case study explores this relationship using a novel approach. Better understanding may improve trial design, conduct, reporting and implementation, helping patients benefit from the best available evidence.We employed...
Paper Details
Title
A mixed methods case study investigating how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are reported, understood and interpreted in practice
Published Date
May 12, 2020
Volume
20
Issue
1
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History