Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles need not be statistically wrong

Volume: 9, Pages: 366 - 366
Published: May 14, 2020
Abstract
Most scientometricians reject the use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles and their authors. The well-known San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment also strongly objects against this way of using the impact factor. Arguments against the use of the impact factor at the level of individual articles are often based on statistical considerations. The skewness of journal citation distributions typically...
Paper Details
Title
Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles need not be statistically wrong
Published Date
May 14, 2020
Volume
9
Pages
366 - 366
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.