Response to ‘What makes the blood go around?’
Abstract
We thank Dr [Dalmau (2020)][1] for taking an interest in our review ([Joyce and Wang, 2020][2]). As we emphasised in our article, Guyton's model notoriously polarises opinion (e.g. [Brengelmann, 2006][3]; [Magder, 2006][4]), and we appreciate the correspondent’s eagerness to foster...
Paper Details
Title
Response to ‘What makes the blood go around?’
Published Date
Apr 15, 2020
Volume
223
Issue
8
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History