“The Grievance Studies Affair” Project: Reconstructing and Assessing the Experimental Design
Abstract
Recently, high media visibility was reached by an experiment that involved “hoaxlike deception” of journals within humanities and social sciences. Its aim was to provide evidence of “inadequate” quality standards especially within gender studies. The article discusses the project in the context of both previous systematic studies of peer reviewing and scientific hoaxes and analyzes its possible empirical outcomes. Despite claims to the contrary,...
Paper Details
Title
“The Grievance Studies Affair” Project: Reconstructing and Assessing the Experimental Design
Published Date
May 4, 2020
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
402 - 424
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History