Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand
Abstract
Background Public health care payer organizations face increasing pressures to make transparent and sustainable coverage decisions about ever more expensive prescription drugs, suggesting a need for public engagement in coverage decisions. However, little is known about countries’ approaches to integrating public preferences in existing funding decisions. The aim of this study was to describe how Belgium and New Zealand used deliberative...
Paper Details
Title
Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand
Published Date
Apr 25, 2020
Journal
Volume
20
Issue
1
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History