Match!

Art-Science Collaboration in an EPSRC/BBSRC-Funded Synthetic Biology UK Research Centre.

Published on Apr 21, 2020in Nanoethics1.359
· DOI :10.1007/S11569-020-00367-3
Michael Reinsborough1
Estimated H-index: 1
Abstract
Here I examine the potential for art-science collaborations to be the basis for deliberative discussions on research agendas and direction. Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has become a science policy goal in synthetic biology and several other high-profile areas of scientific research. While art-science collaborations offer the potential to engage both publics and scientists and thus possess the potential to facilitate the desired "mutual responsiveness" (Rene von Schomberg) between researchers, institutional actors, publics and various stakeholders, there are potential challenges in effectively implementing collaborations as well as dangers in potentially instrumentalizing artistic work for science policy or innovation agendas when power differentials in collaborations remain unacknowledged. Art-science collaborations can be thought of as processes of exchange which require acknowledgement of and attention to artistic agendas (how can science be a conceptual and material resource for new aesthetics work) as well as identification of and attention to aesthetic dimensions of scientific research (how are aesthetics and affective framings a part of a specific epistemological resource for scientific research). I suggest the advantage of specifically identifying public engagement/science communication as a distinct aspect of such projects so that aesthetic, scientific or social science/philosophical research agendas are not subsumed to the assumption that the primary or only value of art-science collaborations is as a form of public engagement or science communication to mediate biological research community public relations. Likewise, there may be potential benefits of acknowledging an art-science-RRI triangle as stepping stone to a more reflexive research agenda within the STS/ science communication/science policy community. Using BrisSynBio, an EPSRC/BBSRC-funded research centre in synthetic biology, I will discuss the framing for art-science collaborations and practical implementation and make remarks on what happened there. The empirical evidence reviewed here supports the model I propose but additionally, points to the need to broaden the conception of and possible purposes, or motivations for art, for example, in the case of cross-sectoral collaboration with community engaged art.
  • References (33)
  • Citations (1)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2001
1 Author (Jon Cooper)
20101.26Synthese
1 Author (Nancy Tuana)
24 Citations
2015
1 Author (Marta Teperek)
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References33
Newest
#1Julie KentH-Index: 17
#2Darian Meacham (UM: Maastricht University)H-Index: 2
It is increasingly suggested that shortages in the supply chain for human blood could be met by the development of techniques to manufacture human blood ex vivo. These techniques fall broadly under the umbrella of synthetic biology. We examine the biopolitical context surrounding the ex vivo culture of red blood cells through the linked concepts of alienation, immunity, bio-value and biosecuritization. We engage with diverse meanings of synthetic blood, and questions about how the discourses of ...
Source
#1Christine Aicardi ('KCL': King's College London)H-Index: 4
#2Michael Reinsborough ('KCL': King's College London)H-Index: 1
Last. Nikolas Rose ('KCL': King's College London)H-Index: 53
view all 3 authors...
The EU-funded Human Brain Project (HBP) aimed to deliver advances in brain science, cognitive neuroscience and brain-inspired computing which would have broad-ranging implications and benefit European citizens. Achieving such outcomes is dependent, in part, upon the ability of large scale research projects to anticipate potential needs and concerns of user communities as well as other stakeholders and society in general and integrate these into their research programme. While the responsibility ...
8 CitationsSource
#1S SherkowJacobH-Index: 1
Abstract The development of CRISPR depends, in part, on the patents—past, present, and future—covering it. As for the past, the origins of the CRISPR patent landscape predate its use as a gene editing technology. Fundamental patents covering CRISPR-Cas9 as a genomic editing system did not first arise until 2012; they sparked the now canonical dispute between the University of California and the Broad Institute. The present dispute has not stopped widespread licensing of critical patents, however...
9 CitationsSource
The imagination of possible scientific futures has a colourful history of interaction with scientific research agendas and public expectations. The 2017 annual UK Science in Public conference included a panel discussing this. Emphasizing fiction as a method for engaging with and mapping the influence of possible futures, this panel discussed the role of science fiction historically, the role of science fiction in public attitudes to artificial intelligence, and its potential as a method for enga...
Source
This article examines visual practices inside the laboratory and in the arts, highlighting a problem of reductionism in the transformation from data to images and in the visual incarnation of the neuro-realism fallacy, that is the extreme images of brain scan. Neurosciences are not inherently reductionist. John R. Mallard’s work around data visualisation problems in the development of biomedical imaging shows how scientists themselves can be attentive to the construction of visual practices and ...
Source
#2Gregory D. GraffH-Index: 18
Last. Bent JohansenH-Index: 22
view all 4 authors...
Early views on the control of the CRISPR-Cas disruptive enabling technology and access for follow-on commercial applications.
28 CitationsSource
#1Andrew BalmerH-Index: 8
#2Kate BulpinH-Index: 5
Last. Susan Molyneux-HodgsonH-Index: 7
view all 3 authors...
This book explores the emergence of a new scientific field, synthetic biology, and the many bold promises its proponents have made to change the future of science, industry and humanity. It explores how people tried to change their practices to bring engineering and biology together and to realise such promises from within their everyday lives
11 Citations
#1Stevienna de Saille (University of Sheffield)H-Index: 4
#2Fabien Medvecky (University of Otago)H-Index: 5
The proponents of responsible innovation (RI) have often opened their discussions with the reassurance that while they are against irresponsible innovation, they are also not advocating irresponsible stagnation. However, in the two-by-two matrix generally used to illustrate this model of innovation, the quadrant for responsible stagnation has so far gone largely unmentioned, let alone explored. This paper draws on existing real-world cases to examine what arguments drawn from ecological economic...
14 CitationsSource
#1Bethany A. BellH-Index: 16
#2Grant B. MorganH-Index: 12
Last. John M. FerronH-Index: 23
view all 5 authors...
Whereas general sample size guidelines have been suggested when estimating multilevel models, they are only generalizable to a relatively limited number of data conditions and model structures, both of which are not very feasible for the applied researcher. In an effort to expand our understanding of two-level multilevel models under less than ideal conditions, Monte Carlo methods, through SAS/IML, were used to examine model convergence rates, parameter point estimates (statistical bias), parame...
70 CitationsSource
#1David H. Guston (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 25
Anticipatory governance is ‘a broad-based capacity extended through society that can act on a variety of inputs to manage emerging knowledge-based technologies while such management is still possible’. It motivates activities designed to build capacities in foresight, engagement, and integration – as well as through their production ensemble. These capacities encourage and support the reflection of scientists, engineers, policy makers, and other publics on their roles in new technologies. This a...
174 CitationsSource
Cited By1
Newest
Source