Match!

Alliance-specific habitat selection by male Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins in Shark Bay, Western Australia

Published on Jun 1, 2020in Animal Behaviour2.675
· DOI :10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2020.03.014
O. O'Brien (UMassD: University of Massachusetts Dartmouth), Simon J. Allen24
Estimated H-index: 24
(UoB: University of Bristol)
+ 1 AuthorsRichard C. Connor41
Estimated H-index: 41
(UMassD: University of Massachusetts Dartmouth)
Abstract
Individuals and groups within the same population may differ in their use of resources. Also referred to as niche specialization, such differences can be documented through direct or indirect observation of resource or habitat use. Here, we examined selective habitat use in alliance-forming male Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops aduncus, in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Using 6 years of sighting data (2001–2006), we calculated the home ranges of 17 male alliances (comprising 3–14 individuals each). We defined five habitat types in the study area and measured the proportion of each habitat type in the home range of each alliance. Habitat selectivity was examined using selection ratios of used and available habitat within alliance home ranges. Since home range is also a form of habitat selection, we also examined selection ratios of alliances within defined subareas within the study area. Subareas were the combined home ranges of subsets of alliances that were linked by general location, distinctive habitat features and seasonal movement patterns. During each sighting, the predominant group behaviour was recorded. We analysed data from all sightings (which included all behavioural types: resting, travelling, socializing and foraging), as well as a restricted set of foraging groups only. For all sightings, alliances were selective of habitat within each of three subareas (northern, central, southern), and 14 alliances were selective of habitat within their home range. For foraging sightings, alliances within all three subareas were selective with respect to foraging habitat, and seven alliances showed significant selection of foraging habitat within their respective home ranges. Some alliances with broadly overlapping ranges foraged in different habitats. Alliance-specific habitat use may be influenced by ecological and social factors. Our results raise the possibility that the considerable variation in alliance size within this population may be influenced by the distribution of food as well as the distribution of females.
  • References (80)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
10 Citations
2016
5 Authors (Kate R. Sprogis, ..., Lars Bejder)
16 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References80
Newest
#1Livia Gerber (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 5
#2Richard C. Connor (UMassD: University of Massachusetts Dartmouth)H-Index: 41
Last. Michael Krützen (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 34
view all 12 authors...
Male alliances are an intriguing phenomenon in the context of reproduction since, in most taxa, males compete over an indivisible resource, female fertilization. Adult male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in Shark Bay, Western Australia, form long-term, multilevel alliances to sequester estrus females. These alliances are therefore critical to male reproductive success. Yet, the long-term processes leading to the formation of such complex social bonds are still poorly understood. To ident...
4 CitationsSource
1 CitationsSource
#1Sonja Wild (University of Leeds)H-Index: 4
#2Simon J. AllenH-Index: 24
Last. William Hoppitt (University of Leeds)H-Index: 27
view all 6 authors...
Behavioural differences among social groups can arise from differing ecological conditions, genetic predispositions and/or social learning. In the past, social learning has typically been inferred ...
5 CitationsSource
#1M. R. Bizzozzero (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 3
#2Simon J. Allen (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 24
Last. Michael Krützen (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 34
view all 9 authors...
Homophilous behaviour plays a central role in the formation of human friendships. Individuals form social ties with others that show similar phenotypic traits, independently of relatedness. Evidenc...
2 CitationsSource
#1Sonja Wild (University of Leeds)H-Index: 4
#2Michael Krützen (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 34
Last. Simon J. Allen (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 24
view all 6 authors...
Summary One of many challenges in the conservation of biodiversity is the recent trend in the frequency and intensity of extreme climatic events [1] . The Shark Bay World Heritage Area, Western Australia, endured an unprecedented marine heatwave in 2011. Catastrophic losses of habitat-forming seagrass meadows followed [2] , along with mass mortalities of invertebrate and fish communities [3] . Our long-term demographic data on Shark Bay’s resident Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin ( Tursiops adunc...
3 CitationsSource
#1Catherine E. Sheppard (University of Exeter)H-Index: 2
#2Richard Inger (University of Exeter)H-Index: 32
Last. Harry H. Marshall (University of Exeter)H-Index: 16
view all 9 authors...
Individual foraging specialisation has important ecological implications, but its causes in group-living species are unclear. One of the major consequences of group living is increased intragroup competition for resources. Foraging theory predicts that with increased competition, individuals should add new prey items to their diet, widening their foraging niche (‘optimal foraging hypothesis’). However, classic competition theory suggests the opposite: that increased competition leads to niche pa...
10 CitationsSource
#1Richard D. Pillans (O&A: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research)H-Index: 6
#2Russell C. Babcock (O&A: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research)H-Index: 49
Last. Wayne Rochester (O&A: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research)H-Index: 16
view all 7 authors...
Large mobile herbivorous fish that specialise in browsing large brown algae are particularly important on coral reefs because their activities mediate algal–coral competition. Despite this important ecological role, we have a poor understanding of the movement patterns of such large herbivorous fish, including Kyphosus bigibbus. Nineteen K. bigibbus captured near adjacent but distinct patch reefs were tagged with internal acoustic tags and their movements monitored for up to 20 months by an arra...
5 CitationsSource
#1Simon J. Allen (Murdoch University)H-Index: 24
#2Kenneth H. Pollock (NCSU: North Carolina State University)H-Index: 63
Last. Neil R. Loneragan (Murdoch University)H-Index: 43
view all 8 authors...
The incidental capture of wildlife in fishing gear presents a global conservation challenge. As a baseline to inform assessments of the impact of bycatch on bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) interacting with an Australian trawl fishery, we conducted an aerial survey to estimate dolphin abundance across the fishery. Concurrently, we carried out boat-based dolphin photo-identification to assess short-term fidelity to foraging around trawlers, and used photographic and genetic data to infer ...
4 CitationsSource
#1Richard C. Connor (UMassD: University of Massachusetts Dartmouth)H-Index: 41
#2William R. Cioffi (Duke University)H-Index: 3
Last. Michael Krützen (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 34
view all 6 authors...
: Within-species variation in social structure has attracted interest recently because of the potential to explore phenotypic plasticity and, specifically, how demographic and ecological variation influence social structure. Populations of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) vary in male alliance formation, from no alliances to simple pairs to, in Shark Bay, Western Australia, the most complex nested alliances known outside of humans. Examination of ecological contributions to this variation is ...
10 CitationsSource
10 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest