Moderators of the internal consistency of error‐related negativity scores: A meta‐analysis of internal consistency estimates
Abstract
To ensure adequate reliability (i.e., internal consistency), it is common in studies using event‐related brain potentials (ERPs) to exclude participants for having too few trials. This practice is particularly relevant for error‐related ERPs, such as error‐related negativity (ERN), where the number of recorded ERN trials is not entirely under the researcher's control. Furthermore, there is a widespread practice of inferring reliability based on...
Paper Details
Title
Moderators of the internal consistency of error‐related negativity scores: A meta‐analysis of internal consistency estimates
Published Date
Apr 23, 2020
Journal
Volume
57
Issue
8
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History