When poignant stories outweigh cold hard facts: A meta-analysis of the anecdotal bias

Volume: 160, Pages: 51 - 67
Published: Sep 1, 2020
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to resolve mixed findings about which type of evidence is more persuasive—statistical or anecdotal information. In a meta-analysis of 61 papers exploring the persuasive impact of evidence type, we establish that, in situations where emotional engagement is high (e.g., an issue associated with a severe threat, involving a health issue, or affecting oneself), statistical evidence is less influential than anecdotal...
Paper Details
Title
When poignant stories outweigh cold hard facts: A meta-analysis of the anecdotal bias
Published Date
Sep 1, 2020
Volume
160
Pages
51 - 67
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.