Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis
Abstract
Systematic reviews evaluating multiple interventions can be useful in different clinical situations. However, some concerns arise when more than two interventions are compared and there is a paucity of good quality randomized clinical trials. A novel statistical method based on indirect comparisons, called network meta-analysis (NMA), can be a useful approach to find a clinical answer when multiple interventions are evaluated for the same...
Paper Details
Title
Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis
Published Date
Jan 1, 2020
Journal
Volume
148
Issue
1
Pages
109 - 117
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History