In Reply to Chow et al

Volume: 95, Issue: 4, Pages: 491 - 491
Published: Apr 1, 2020
Abstract
We thank Dr. Chow and colleagues for taking interest in our Innovation Report and having ambition to extend our coached peer review technique beyond medical students. Indeed, it is important that we form communities of practice1,2 around early career faculty members looking to up their academic scholarship game. As Dr. Chow and colleagues point out, early career academic clinicians are often asked to perform academic duties beyond their...
Paper Details
Title
In Reply to Chow et al
Published Date
Apr 1, 2020
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
491 - 491
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.