No relationship between researcher impact and replication effect: an analysis of five studies with 100 replications

PeerJ2.70
Volume: 8, Pages: e8014 - e8014
Published: Mar 24, 2020
Abstract
What explanation is there when teams of researchers are unable to successfully replicate already established 'canonical' findings? One suggestion that has been put forward, but left largely untested, is that those researchers who fail to replicate prior studies are of low 'expertise and diligence' and lack the skill necessary to successfully replicate the conditions of the original experiment. Here we examine the replication success of 100...
Paper Details
Title
No relationship between researcher impact and replication effect: an analysis of five studies with 100 replications
Published Date
Mar 24, 2020
Journal
Volume
8
Pages
e8014 - e8014
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.