Analysis of Different Categories of Epistemic and Metacognitive Discourse in Argumentation

Volume: 24, Issue: 4, Pages: 101 - 101
Published: Dec 31, 2019
Abstract
Argumentative practices have been shown to deepen understanding and improve academic performance. After 10 years of work with science curricula designed to develop reasoning, we present a framework grounded in data from our projects for identifying different forms of metacognitive engagement in science inquiry classes. We focus on four categories of discourse from our data: object of thought or discourse; expressions of what someone is thinking;...
Paper Details
Title
Analysis of Different Categories of Epistemic and Metacognitive Discourse in Argumentation
Published Date
Dec 31, 2019
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
101 - 101
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.