Analysis of Different Categories of Epistemic and Metacognitive Discourse in Argumentation
Abstract
Argumentative practices have been shown to deepen understanding and improve academic performance. After 10 years of work with science curricula designed to develop reasoning, we present a framework grounded in data from our projects for identifying different forms of metacognitive engagement in science inquiry classes. We focus on four categories of discourse from our data: object of thought or discourse; expressions of what someone is thinking;...
Paper Details
Title
Analysis of Different Categories of Epistemic and Metacognitive Discourse in Argumentation
Published Date
Dec 31, 2019
Journal
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
101 - 101
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History