Comparison of the Informed Health Choices Key Concepts Framework to other frameworks relevant to teaching and learning how to think critically about health claims and choices: a systematic review

Andrew D Oxman; Laura Martínez García

doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21858.1

doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21858.1

Comparison of the Informed Health Choices Key Concepts Framework to other frameworks relevant to teaching and learning how to think critically about health claims and choices: a systematic review

Andrew D Oxman

96

,

Laura Martínez García

9

F1000Research

Volume: 9, Pages: 164 - 164

Published: Mar 5, 2020

Abstract

Background: The Informed Health Choices (IHC) Key Concepts are principles for evaluating the trustworthiness of claims about treatment effects. The Key Concepts provide a framework for developing learning-resources to help people use the concepts when treatment claims are made, and when they make health choices. Objective: To compare the framework provided by the IHC Key Concepts to...

Paper Fields

Paper Details

Title

Comparison of the Informed Health Choices Key Concepts Framework to other frameworks relevant to teaching and learning how to think critically about health claims and choices: a systematic review

DOI

doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21858.1

Published Date

Mar 5, 2020

Journal

F1000Research

Volume

9

Pages

164 - 164

Citation AnalysisPro

You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro

Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?

Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.

Learn more

Notes

History