Catheter interventions: an unresolved clinical controversy – Authors' reply

Volume: 7, Issue: 3, Pages: e190 - e190
Published: Mar 1, 2020
Abstract
In response to Efthymios Avgerinos and colleagues, we would like to clarify some of the perceived weaknesses of the CAVA trial, 1 Notten P Ten Cate-Hoek AJ Arnoldussen CWKP et al. Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis versus anticoagulation for the prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome (CAVA): a single-blind, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020; 7: e40-e49 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (46)...
Paper Details
Title
Catheter interventions: an unresolved clinical controversy – Authors' reply
Published Date
Mar 1, 2020
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
e190 - e190
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.