Match!

Effects of board characteristics on post-acquisition performance: A study of cross-border acquisitions by firms in the manufacturing sector

Published on Feb 11, 2020in International Business Review
· DOI :10.1016/J.IBUSREV.2020.101674
Deepak K. Datta30
Estimated H-index: 30
(UTA: University of Texas at Arlington),
Dynah A. Basuil5
Estimated H-index: 5
(Asian Institute of Management)
+ 0 AuthorsAnkita Agarwal (UTA: University of Texas at Arlington)
Abstract
Abstract Our study examines how acquiring firm board characteristics influence the performance of cross-border merger and acquisitions (CBMAs). It is based on a sample of 250 large transactions in the manufacturing sector undertaken by U.S. firms in 33 countries between 1991 and 2006. Our findings reveal that acquiring firms having a larger board and outside directors with greater influence exhibit superior post-acquisition shareholder value creation in CBMAs. In addition, our results indicate that acquiring firms with more dominant CEOs perform better in such acquisitions. From the standpoint of firms engaged in CBMAs, our findings suggest that they stand to benefit from having a larger board and influential outside directors who can diligently monitor and advise top management in undertaking CBMAs. Finally, acquiring firms need to recognize that the complexities and challenges generally associated with CBMAs may require dominant CEOs who can provide clear and unambiguous leadership during the pre- and post- acquisition process.
  • References (159)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
21 Citations
2010
3 Authors (En Te Chen, ..., John Nowland)
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References159
Newest
#1Hong Zhu (PKU: Peking University)H-Index: 8
#2Xufei Ma (CUHK: The Chinese University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 14
Last. Mike W. Peng (UTD: University of Texas at Dallas)H-Index: 64
view all 4 authors...
How do home country institutions influence cross-border postacquisition performance? We develop an institutional framework showing that informal and formal institutions not only have important individual effects but also work together in complex and interesting ways. While collectivism and humane orientation (two major informal institutions) can facilitate postacquisition integration and firm performance, shareholder orientation and property rights protection (two formal institutions) constrain ...
8 CitationsSource
#1Derek Horstmeyer (GMU: George Mason University)H-Index: 1
Using a detailed dataset on the meeting sub-structure of the board to create various measures capturing CEO involvement in the internal decision-making processes of the board, this paper investigates the time trends as well as the cross-sectional determinants of internal boardroom control. First, I document that the principal governance reform following the corporate scandals of 2000-2002 was the removal of the CEO as a participating and voting member in board operations - both in terms of board...
4 CitationsSource
#1Chunfang Cao (SYSU: Sun Yat-sen University)H-Index: 2
#2Xiaoyang Li (SJTU: Shanghai Jiao Tong University)H-Index: 6
Last. Guilin LiuH-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
We study the relation between political uncertainty and cross-border acquisitions using national elections as sources of variation in uncertainty. We find that political uncertainty affects the volume, deal structure, and outcome of cross-border acquisitions. Elections in acquirer country encourage firms to acquire targets abroad while elections in target countries deter foreign firms’ inbound acquisitions. At the transaction level, we show that the merging firms adjust termination fee, means of...
1 CitationsSource
#1Fabio Zona (Bocconi University)H-Index: 9
#2Luis R. Gomez-Mejia (ND: University of Notre Dame)H-Index: 51
Last. Michael C. Withers (A&M: Texas A&M University)H-Index: 11
view all 3 authors...
This study develops a combined agency–resource dependence perspective and applies it to the study of interlocking directorates. It suggests that interlocking directorates may exert either a positive or a negative effect on subsequent firm performance, depending on the firm’s relative resources, power imbalance, ownership concentration, and CEO ownership. A test on a sample of 145 Italian companies provides support for hypothesized effects. This study suggests that integrating agency and resource...
41 CitationsSource
#1Jing Zhou (SWUFE: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)H-Index: 1
#2Wei Lan (SWUFE: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)H-Index: 1
This study examines whether-and if so, how-market value for the acquirers from emerging markets is influenced by changes in investor protection induced by acquisitions, in interaction with institutional shareholdings in acquiring firms. Using a sample of Chinese listed acquiring firms for the period 2002–2012, the empirical findings show that Chinese companies gain higher abnormal returns at the takeover period through acquisitions of targets domiciled in countries with superior investor protect...
2 CitationsSource
#1Denis Schweizer (Concordia University)H-Index: 13
#2Thomas Walker (Concordia University)H-Index: 11
Last. Aoran Zhang (Concordia University)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
Abstract This paper explores whether and how political connections affect the likelihood of completing a cross-border M&A deal for Chinese publicly listed, but privately-owned enterprises (POEs) and the resulting firm performance. In line with our proposed political connection trade-off theory, we find that POEs with politically connected top managers are more likely to complete a cross-border M&A deal than POEs with no such connections, but that this comes at the cost of negative announcement r...
10 CitationsSource
#1Dennis Veltrop (UG: University of Groningen)H-Index: 3
#2Eric Molleman (UG: University of Groningen)H-Index: 25
Last. Hans van Ees (UG: University of Groningen)H-Index: 14
view all 4 authors...
In this paper we address how director expertise impacts a director's social status and conformity within the board. Our results, derived from two unique multi‐source datasets of peer ratings on director status and conformity of non‐executive directors from Dutch organizations, indicate that industry‐specific expertise and financial expertise differently impact directors’ social status and influence within the board. We find that directors’ individual performance orientation – the motivation to d...
Source
#1Dynah A. Basuil (Asian Institute of Management)H-Index: 5
#2Deepak K. Datta (UTA: University of Texas at Arlington)H-Index: 30
Do outside directors influence the performance of cross-border acquisitions? We use resource dependence arguments and a sample of 431 relatively large cross-border acquisitions undertaken by U.S. firms to explore how the human and social capital of outside directors on the acquiring firm's board influence shareholder value creation. Findings indicate that human and social capital linked to board tenure, external board appointments, and region-specific cross-border acquisition experience, but not...
3 CitationsSource
#1Miroslav Mateev (American University in the Emirates)H-Index: 5
#2Kristiyan AndonovH-Index: 1
In this paper, we investigate whether European mergers and acquisitions (M&A) create more value to target than bidding firm shareholders, and why bidders pay larger premiums in cross-border than in domestic acquisitions. Using a sample of 275 intra-European public acquisitions initiated between 2003 and 2010, we find target firm shareholders to earn significantly positive bid premiums in both domestic and cross-border acquisitions. However, these premiums are substantially greater, approximately...
Source
#1Hyejin Cho (KU: Korea University)H-Index: 2
#2He Soung Ahn (KU: Korea University)H-Index: 1
Recognizing that cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are not alike in terms of how the payment method is structured, this paper investigates the role of stock payment that results in ownership sharing with foreign targets. Based on our empirical analysis using a sample of 4720 cross-border M&A deals during 1997–2012, we find that stock payment in cross-border M&As has a detrimental effect on shareholder value because of the negative signaling effect. We further show that stock payment c...
4 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest