Quantifying Disciplinary Voices: An Automated Approach to Interactional Metadiscourse in Successful Student Writing
Abstract
This article reports on a study that explored cross-disciplinary variation in the use of metadiscourse markers in advanced-level student writing, put forward as a realistic target for novice writers. Starting from the stance and engagement categories included in Hyland’s model, we first conducted a comprehensive quantitative analysis of interactional metadiscourse across disciplines. For this analysis, we used an automated processing tool that...
Paper Details
Title
Quantifying Disciplinary Voices: An Automated Approach to Interactional Metadiscourse in Successful Student Writing
Published Date
Jan 28, 2020
Journal
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
208 - 244
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History