Match!

Measures of firm risk-taking: revisiting Bowman’s paradox

Published on Dec 20, 2019in Managerial Finance
· DOI :10.1108/MF-09-2019-0466
Sources
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the existing literature on the relationship between firm-level risk and returns and to explore other ways of measuring firm risk-taking. Literature overwhelmingly shows a negative relationship between firm-level risk and returns based on accounting data, which is counter-intuitive from the rational perspective of risk-aversion. This paper revisits this so-called Bowman’s paradox by examining the wealth of literature on the topic and empirically tests alternative measures of firm risk-taking that could provide a counter-argument on the existence of the paradox. Design/methodology/approach After formulating the criteria for such a measure, potential measures of firm risk-taking were developed based on variability of some key financial ratios and empirically tested using US listed companies’ data for several time periods from 1992 to 2016. Literature has explored the use of these financial ratios (e.g. R&D expenses as percentage of sales) based only on their magnitude. This paper is novel in that it examines the variability and not just the magnitude of these parameters. Findings Results showed the same counter-intuitive negative relationship between firm risk-taking and returns but the paper was able to identify an area for future theory development that hopefully will lead to a firm risk-taking measure that would exhibit the elusive positive relationship with returns. Originality/value The literature review of this paper brought together and provided a succinct classification of the various explanations for Bowman’s paradox that allowed the identification of a potentially rich area of research. It identified a gap in the literature which is the formulation of suitable measures of firm risk-taking and made investigations in this area.
  • References (43)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2018
1 Author (Lujer Santacruz)
1 Citations
14 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References43
Newest
#1Philip Bromiley (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 32
#2Kent D. Miller (Purdue University)H-Index: 28
Last. Devaki Rau (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 13
view all 3 authors...
18 CitationsSource
#1Philip Bromiley (UCI: University of California, Irvine)H-Index: 32
#2Devaki Rau (NIU: Northern Illinois University)H-Index: 13
Last. Yu Zhang (China Europe International Business School)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
Research summary: Many studies use research and development (R&D) intensity or R&D spending as a proxy for risk taking, but we have little evidence that either associates positively with firm risk. We analyze the relations between R&D intensity (R&D spending to sales) and R&D spending on the one hand and 11 different indicators of firm risk on the other, using data from 1,907 to 3,908 firms in various industries over 13 years. The analysis finds a general lack of consistent positive association ...
16 CitationsSource
#1Robert E. Hoskisson (Rice University)H-Index: 59
#2Francesco Chirico (Jönköping University)H-Index: 19
Last. Eni Gambeta (Rice University)H-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
Managerial risk taking is a critical aspect of strategic management. To improve competitive advantage and performance, managers need to take risks, often in an uncertain environment. Formal economi ...
36 CitationsSource
What is the relationship between the risk and expected return of an investment? The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) provides an initial framework for answering this question. The CAPM (Sharpe, 1964; Lintner, 1965) marks the birth of asset pricing theory. This model is based on the idea that not all risk should affect asset prices. The model thus provides insight into the kind of risk that is related to return. Four decades later, the CAPM is still widely used in applications. The CAPM provide...
2 CitationsSource
#1Anthony Dewayne Holder (UT: University of Toledo)H-Index: 6
#2Alexey Petkevich (UT: University of Toledo)H-Index: 1
Last. Gary S. Moore (UT: University of Toledo)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
1 CitationsSource
3 CitationsSource
#1Sanjai Bhagat (CU: University of Colorado Boulder)H-Index: 31
#2Brian J. Bolton (PSU: Portland State University)H-Index: 9
Last. Jun Lu (CUFE: Central University of Finance and Economics)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
We investigate the link between firm size and risk-taking among financial institutions during the period of 2002 to 2012 and find size is positively correlated with risk-taking measures. Second, a decomposition of the primary risk measure, the Z-score, reveals that financial firms engage in excessive risk-taking mainly through increased leverage. Third, banks that enjoy better corporate governance engage in less risk-taking. Fourth, investment banks engage in more risk-taking compared to commerc...
33 CitationsSource
#1Torben Juul Andersen (CBS: Copenhagen Business School)H-Index: 17
#2Richard A. Bettis (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 29
type="main" xml:id="smj2281-abs-0001"> We study a longitudinal fit model of adaptation and its association with the longitudinal risk-return relationship. The model allows the firm to adjust its position in response to partial learning about a changing environment characterized by two path-dependent processes—a random walk and a stochastic trend. Computational simulations at low levels of learning in both environmental contexts are consistent with empirical data. However, the results are also co...
13 CitationsSource
#1Ivan E. Brick (RU: Rutgers University)H-Index: 15
#2Oded Palmon (RU: Rutgers University)H-Index: 12
Last. Itzhak Venezia (HUJI: Hebrew University of Jerusalem)H-Index: 14
view all 3 authors...
Bowman's (1980, 1982, 1984) finding of a negative relationship between the means and variances of accounting returns (the Bowman Paradox) spurred a considerable literature analyzing this phenomenon. The sign of the relationship between the mean return on equity (ROE) and its standard deviation remains unresolved. Concerns were raised about ROE measurement and statistical techniques used in establishing the paradox. The papers critiquing (and supporting) it were mostly limited in scope, studied o...
6 CitationsSource
#1René M. Stulz (Max M. Fisher College of Business)H-Index: 93
28 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest