The change in investor reaction to 10-K filings after Regulation Full Disclosure and the Sarbanes–Oxley Act

Published on Dec 4, 2019in Managerial Finance
· DOI :10.1108/MF-02-2019-0100
Rakesh Bharati4
Estimated H-index: 4
Susan Crain1
Estimated H-index: 1
+ 0 AuthorsShrikant P. Jategaonkar5
Estimated H-index: 5
The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the investor reaction to 10-K filings has changed since the implementation of Regulation Full Disclosure (FD) and the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX) and examine whether the market still underreacts to 10-K content and exhibits the continuation of filing day returns (FDRs) documented by You and Zhang (2009) after the passage of these regulations.,The sample consists of 39,270 10-K filings over the sample period of 1996 to 2012. Performance of portfolios created based on FDRs around 10-K filings is examined. Regression models are used for multivariate analysis. Carhart αs are obtained using the four-factor risk adjustment model.,By comparing investor reaction to 10-K filings pre- and post-regulation, the paper shows a significant change in stock price behavior since the implementation of FD and SOX. Analogous to Burks (2011), results suggest improved price efficiency around 10-K filings. In the long-run of up to one year following the filing, the continuation of FDRs documented by You and Zhang (2009) disappears post-2000, especially after the implementation of SOX. Overall findings suggest that investors price the information in 10-K filings significantly differently after FD and SOX than before.,The sample ends in 2012. Therefore, this study does not examine the implications of the Dodd-Frank Act.,The paper contributes to the literature related to the impact of FD and SOX and market reaction to filings of financial reports. The current literature documents that there is a continuation of FDRs up to a year. This paper shows that the continuation has disappeared since FD and SOX were implemented.
  • References (26)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
4 Citations
1 Author (Hai Lu)
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Harjeet S. Bhabra (Concordia University)H-Index: 10
#2Ashrafee Tanvir Hossain (MUN: Memorial University of Newfoundland)H-Index: 4
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine whether or not the seminal legislation called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) influenced a strategic shift in the merger and acquisition (M&A) market. Design/methodology/approach The sample consists of 4,839 completed deals undertaken by US acquirers from the Securities Data Corporation’s US M&As database from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2009. The authors used the standard event study methodology for short-term performance analysis and the Berkovi...
4 CitationsSource
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze and compare the performance of corporate acquisitions between the pre- and post-SOX periods, using both short-term and long-term analyses. Design/methodology/approach The sample includes 9,463 mergers and tender offers undertaken by publicly traded US firms between 1996 and 2009. The authors used the standard event study methodology for short-term performance analysis; Berkovitch and Narayanan (1993) method to identify merger motives; and standard ...
5 CitationsSource
#1Edward Lee (University of Manchester)H-Index: 17
#2Norman Strong (University of Manchester)H-Index: 20
Last. Zhenmei Judy Zhu (Fudan University)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Edward Lee (University of Manchester)H-Index: 17
#2Norman Strong (University of Manchester)H-Index: 20
Last. Zhenmei Zhu (Fudan University)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
Between 2000 and 2003 a series of disclosure and analyst regulations curbing abusive financial reporting and analyst behavior were enacted to strengthen the information environment of U.S. capital markets. We investigate whether these regulations reduced security mispricing and increased stock market efficiency. After the regulations, we find a significant reduction in short-term stock price continuation following analyst forecast revisions and earnings announcements. The effect was more pronoun...
18 CitationsSource
#1Rashiqa Kamal (University of Wisconsin–Whitewater)H-Index: 2
#2Edward R. LawrenceH-Index: 7
Last. Arun J. PrakashH-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
Purpose - There is empirical evidence that a firm's addition to S&P 500 results in significant abnormal returns and an increase in a stock's liquidity. The purpose of this paper is to argue that changes in the information environment after the year 2000 due to the implementation of Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD), decimalization and Sarbanes Oxley Act, should result in reduced abnormal returns in the post-2000 period. Design/methodology/approach - The authors compare the abnormal returns and liq...
2 CitationsSource
#1Jeffrey J. Burks (ND: University of Notre Dame)H-Index: 8
70 CitationsSource
#1Haifeng YouH-Index: 9
#2Xiao-Jun Zhang (UC: University of California)H-Index: 14
We study the immediate and delayed market reaction to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) EDGAR 10-K filings. Unusual trading volumes and stock-price movements are documented during the days around the 10-K filing dates. The abnormal price movements are positively associated with future accounting profitability, indicating that 10-K reports contain useful information about future firm performance. In addition, investors’ reaction to 10-K information seems sluggish, as demonstrated by t...
170 CitationsSource
#1Eli Bartov (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 25
#2Daniel A. Cohen (UTD: University of Texas at Dallas)H-Index: 21
This paper asks two questions. First, has the prevalence of expectations management to meet/beat analyst expectations changed in the aftermath of the 2001-2002 accounting scandals and the passage of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)? Second, has the mix among the three mechanisms used for meeting earnings targets: accrual earnings management, real earnings management, and earnings expectations management shifted in the Post-SOX Period? We document that the propensity to meet/beat analyst expecta...
104 CitationsSource
#1S.P. Kothari (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 51
#2Susan Shu (BC: Boston College)H-Index: 6
Last. Peter D. Wysocki (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 21
view all 3 authors...
In this study, we examine whether managers delay disclosure of bad news relative to good news. If managers accumulate and withhold bad news up to a certain threshold, but leak and immediately reveal good news to investors, then we expect the magnitude of the negative stock price reaction to bad news disclosures to be greater than the magnitude of the positive stock price reaction to good news disclosures. We present evidence consistent with this prediction. Our analysis suggests that management,...
717 CitationsSource
#1Baljit K. Sidhu (UNSW: University of New South Wales)H-Index: 12
#2Tom Smith (ANU: Australian National University)H-Index: 23
Last. Richard H. Willis (Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand)H-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD), imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission in October 2000, was designed to prohibit disclosure of material private information to selected market participants. The informational advantage such select participants gain is unclear. If multiple “insiders” receive identical information, private information is immediately incorporated in price and each insider has zero expected profit. If, on the other hand, Regulation FD has curtailed the flow of information ...
72 CitationsSource
Cited By0