Match!

Stream water quality assessment by metabarcoding of invertebrates

Published on Apr 1, 2020in Ecological Indicators4.49
· DOI :10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105982
Franziska Kuntke1
Estimated H-index: 1
(AAU: Aalborg University),
Nadieh de Jonge8
Estimated H-index: 8
(AAU: Aalborg University)
+ 1 AuthorsJeppe Lund Nielsen48
Estimated H-index: 48
(AAU: Aalborg University)
Abstract
Abstract Stream water quality assessments are conducted by analysing invertebrate communities as a biological quality element (BQE). In Denmark, water quality assessments of streams are often estimated according to the Danish Stream Fauna Index (DSFI). The conventional DSFI method is time consuming and requires highly specialized expertise for species identification of the relevant indicator invertebrates. Furthermore, conventional species identification of relevant indicators may be hampered by differences in, or lack of, developmental stages or due to damages during the sampling process. Metabarcoding has the potential to overcome the challenges associated with conventional morphology-based species identification. Using high-throughput DNA sequencing, metabarcoding of invertebrates collected from stream water provides an alternative to the expertise of taxonomic experts. The present study applies metabarcoding using universal invertebrate primers targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene to determine stream water qualities. The obtained community profiles were compared to conventional water quality assessments according to the Danish Stream Fauna Index (DSFI). Multivariate data analysis of obtained sequences resulted in distinct clusters of taxonomic units, which reflected the stream water quality as defined by the DSFI. In conclusion, the present study supports the knowledge that invertebrates are efficient as BQE for stream water quality assessment. DNA sequencing by metabarcoding provided a unique fingerprint of the studied communities of invertebrates and was successful in describing the stream water quality.
  • References (39)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
16 Citations
33 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References39
Newest
#1Jan Pawlowski (University of Geneva)H-Index: 61
#2Mary Kelly-Quinn (UCD: University College Dublin)H-Index: 18
Last. Maria Kahlert (SLU: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)H-Index: 23
view all 33 authors...
The bioassessment of aquatic ecosystems is currently based on various biotic indices that use the occurrence and/ or abundance of selected taxonomic groups to define ecological status. These conventional indices have some limitations, often related to difficulties in morphological identification of bioindicator taxa. Recent development of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding could potentially alleviate some of these limitations, by using DNA se- quences instead of morphology to identify organisms and...
39 CitationsSource
#1Daniel Hering (University of Duisburg-Essen)H-Index: 45
#2Ángel BorjaH-Index: 61
Last. Martyn Kelly (Durham University)H-Index: 31
view all 17 authors...
Abstract Assessment of ecological status for the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) is based on “Biological Quality Elements” (BQEs), namely phytoplankton, benthic flora, benthic invertebrates and fish. Morphological identification of these organisms is a time-consuming and expensive procedure. Here, we assess the options for complementing and, perhaps, replacing morphological identification with procedures using eDNA, metabarcoding or similar approaches. We rate the applicability of DNA-b...
44 CitationsSource
#1Rachel Stubbington (NTU: Nottingham Trent University)H-Index: 16
#2Richard P. Chadd (EA: Environment Agency)H-Index: 13
Last. Thibault DatryH-Index: 21
view all 12 authors...
Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES) are common across Europe and dominate some Mediterranean river networks. In all climate zones, IRES support high biodiversity and provide ecosystem services. As dynamic ecosystems that transition between flowing, pool, and dry states, IRES are typically poorly represented in biomonitoring programmes implemented to characterize EU Water Framework Directive ecological status. We report the results of a survey completed by representatives from 20 Eur...
20 CitationsSource
#1Vasco Elbrecht (University of Duisburg-Essen)H-Index: 12
#2Ecaterina Edith Vamos (University of Duisburg-Essen)H-Index: 3
Last. Florian Leese (University of Duisburg-Essen)H-Index: 29
view all 5 authors...
Summary DNA metabarcoding holds great promise for the assessment of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystems. However, few large-scale studies have compared the performance of DNA metabarcoding with that of routine morphological identification. We performed metabarcoding using four primer sets on macroinvertebrate samples from 18 stream sites across Finland. The samples were collected in 2013 and identified based on morphology as part of a Finnish stream monitoring program. Specimens were morphol...
70 CitationsSource
#1Vasco Elbrecht (University of Duisburg-Essen)H-Index: 12
#2Bianca Peinert (University of Duisburg-Essen)H-Index: 2
Last. Florian Leese (University of Duisburg-Essen)H-Index: 29
view all 3 authors...
Environmental bulk samples often contain many different taxa that vary several orders of magnitude in biomass. This can be problematic in DNA metabarcoding and metagenomic high-throughput sequencing approaches, as large specimens contribute disproportionately high amounts of DNA template. Thus, a few specimens of high biomass will dominate the dataset, potentially leading to smaller specimens remaining undetected. Sorting of samples by specimen size (as a proxy for biomass) and balancing the amo...
42 CitationsSource
#1Vasco Elbrecht (University of Duisburg-Essen)H-Index: 12
#2Florian Leese (University of Duisburg-Essen)H-Index: 29
A central challenge in the present era of biodiversity loss is to assess and manage human impacts on freshwater ecosystems. Macroinvertebrates are an important group for bioassessment as many taxa show specific responses to environmental conditions. However, generating accurate macroinvertebrate inventories based on larval morphology is difficult and error-prone. Here, DNA metabarcoding provides new opportunities. Its potential to accurately identify invertebrates in bulk samples to the species ...
41 CitationsSource
#1Satoshi Yamamoto (Kobe University)H-Index: 16
#2Reiji Masuda (Kyoto University)H-Index: 21
Last. Masaki Miya (AMNH: American Museum of Natural History)H-Index: 57
view all 8 authors...
Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals local fish communities in a species-rich coastal sea
83 CitationsSource
#1Nikolaos Voulvoulis (Imperial College London)H-Index: 37
#2Karl Dominic Arpon (Imperial College London)H-Index: 1
Last. Theodoros Giakoumis (Imperial College London)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
The Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (WFD) is widely accepted as the most substantial and ambitious piece of European environmental legislation to date. It has been referred to as a once in a generation opportunity to restore Europe's waters and a potential template for future environmental regulations. However, fifteen years since it was adopted, and with many problems and delays in its implementation, the WFD has not delivered its main objectives of non-deterioration of water status and th...
106 CitationsSource
#1Eva AylagasH-Index: 6
#2Iñaki MendibilH-Index: 4
view all 4 authors...
Metabarcoding is an accurate and cost-effective technique that allows for simultaneous taxonomic identification of multiple environmental samples. Application of this technique to marine benthic macroinvertebrate biodiversity assessment for biomonitoring purposes requires standardization of laboratory and data analysis procedures. In this context, protocols for creation and sequencing of amplicon libraries and their related bioinformatics analysis have been recently published. However, a standar...
11 CitationsSource
#1Kristy Deiner (Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology)H-Index: 19
#2Emanuel A. Fronhofer (Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology)H-Index: 18
Last. Florian Altermatt (Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology)H-Index: 36
view all 5 authors...
DNA of a given organism can be detected from its surroundings. Here, Deiner and colleagues use so-called environmental DNA to estimate biodiversity of both aquatic and terrestrial organisms in and near river.
124 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest