Review paper
The Morcellation “Debate” and the FDA 510(k) Process—A Call for Further Reform
Abstract
Few gynecologic surgeons understand the mechanism by which surgical instruments are approved for human use and marketing or do they appreciate the central role they play in postmarket surveillance and reporting after instruments have come to market.Using the experience with the uterine morcellator, this review will detail the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) system for approving surgical instruments and the potential pitfalls of this...
Paper Details
Title
The Morcellation “Debate” and the FDA 510(k) Process—A Call for Further Reform
Published Date
Dec 1, 2019
Volume
74
Issue
12
Pages
749 - 753
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History