A Meta-analysis of the Relative Effectiveness of the Item Count Technique Compared to Direct Questioning
Abstract
This article presents an updated meta-analysis of survey experiments comparing the performance of the item count technique (ICT) and the direct questioning method. After synthesizing 246 effect sizes from 54 studies, we find that the probability that a sensitive item will be selected is .089 higher when using ICT compared to direct questioning. In recognition of the heterogeneity across studies, we seek to explain this variation by means of...
Paper Details
Title
A Meta-analysis of the Relative Effectiveness of the Item Count Technique Compared to Direct Questioning
Published Date
Dec 17, 2019
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
760 - 799
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History