Match!

Impact of staff turnover during cardiac surgical procedures.

Published on Nov 30, 2019in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery5.261
· DOI :10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.051
Jordan P. Bloom4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Harvard University),
Philicia Moonsamy3
Estimated H-index: 3
(Harvard University)
+ 7 AuthorsDavid A. D'Alessandro19
Estimated H-index: 19
(Harvard University)
Sources
Abstract
Abstract Objective The impact of staff turnover during cardiac procedures is unknown. Accurate inventory of sharps (needles/blades) requires attention by surgical teams and sharp count errors (SCEs) result in delays, can lead to retained foreign objects and may signify communication breakdown. We hypothesized that increased team turnover raises the likelihood of SCEs and may negatively affect patient outcomes. Methods All cardiac operations performed at our institution from May 2011 to March 2016 were reviewed for SCEs from a prospectively maintained database. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. Results Among 7,264 consecutive cardiac operations, SCEs occurred in 723 (10%) cases. There were no retained sharps detected by x-ray in our series. SCE rates were lower on first start cases (7.7% vs. 10.7%, p Conclusion SCEs are more prevalent with increased team turnover and during non-first start cases or weekends. SCEs may be a surrogate marker for other errors and thus increased mortality. Reducing intraoperative team turnover or optimizing handoffs may reduce SCEs.
  • References (12)
  • Citations (3)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
20143.11Transfusion
24 Citations
1 Citations
62 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References12
Newest
ABSTRACT Background The I-PASS Handoff Study found that introduction of a handoff bundle (handoff and teamwork training for residents, a mnemonic, a handoff tool, a faculty development program, and a sustainability campaign) at 9 pediatrics residency programs was associated with improved communication and patient safety. Objective This parallel qualitative study aimed to understand resident experiences with I-PASS and to inform future implementation and sustainability strategies. Methods Residen...
4 CitationsSource
#1Callisia N. Clarke (MCW: Medical College of Wisconsin)H-Index: 11
#2Sameer H. Patel (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)H-Index: 14
Last. Thomas A. Aloia (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)H-Index: 45
view all 13 authors...
Background Duty-hour regulations have increased the frequency of trainee-trainee patient handoffs. Each handoff creates a potential source for communication errors that can lead to near-miss and patient-harm events. We investigated the utility, efficacy, and trainee experience associated with implementation of a novel, standardized, electronic handoff system. Methods We conducted a prospective intervention study of trainee-trainee handoffs of inpatients undergoing complex general surgical oncolo...
4 CitationsSource
#2Renata Cristina de Campos Pereira Silveira (USP: University of São Paulo)H-Index: 9
Last. Rn Cristina Maria Galvão PhD (USP: University of São Paulo)H-Index: 2
view all 4 authors...
Aims and objectives To analyse the evidence reported in the literature concerning the surgical count process for surgical sponges, surgical instruments and sharps and to identify knowledge gaps for future research on the surgical count process. Background The surgical count process stands out among the practices advocated by the World Health Organization to ensure surgical safety. The literature indicates that this practice should be performed in all surgical processes. However, surgical items a...
4 CitationsSource
Abstract A surgical item unintentionally retained in a patient after an operative or other invasive procedure is a serious, preventable medical error with the potential to cause the patient great harm. Perioperative RNs play a key role in preventing retained surgical items (RSIs). The updated AORN “Guideline for prevention of retained surgical items” provides guidance for implementing a consistent, multidisciplinary approach to RSI prevention; accounting for surgical items; preventing retention ...
6 CitationsSource
#1Cornelius A. Thiels (Mayo Clinic)H-Index: 10
#2Tarun Mohan Lal (Mayo Clinic)H-Index: 1
Last. Juliane Bingener (Mayo Clinic)H-Index: 21
view all 10 authors...
Introduction We report the first prospective analysis of human factors elements contributing to invasive procedural never events by using a validated Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Methods From August 2009 to August 2014, operative and invasive procedural “Never Events” (retained foreign object, wrong site/side procedure, wrong implant, wrong procedure) underwent systematic causation analysis promptly after the event. Contributing human factors were categorized using t...
32 CitationsSource
#1Amy J. Starmer (OHSU: Oregon Health & Science University)H-Index: 13
#2Nancy D. Spector (Drexel University)H-Index: 12
Last. Christopher P. Landrigan (Harvard University)H-Index: 39
view all 37 authors...
We conducted a prospective intervention study of a resident handoff-improvement program in nine hospitals, measuring rates of medical errors, preventable adverse events, and miscommunications, as well as resident workflow. The intervention included a mnemonic to standardize oral and written handoffs, handoff and communication training, a faculty development and observation program, and a sustainability campaign. Error rates were measured through active surveillance. Handoffs were assessed by mea...
302 CitationsSource
The World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Safe Surgery Saves Lives campaign in 2007 to improve safety of surgical care in the world. As a part of the campaign, the first edition of the Surgical Safety Checklist was created through an international consultative process in 2008 and the second edition was published in the WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009. The guidelines consist of ten essential objectives for safe surgery, and nine of the ten objectives are facilitated by introducing the...
2 Citations
#2Andrew FosterH-Index: 3
Last. Robert M. RushH-Index: 15
view all 8 authors...
Abstract Introduction Operating room time is highly resource intensive, and delays can be a source of lost revenue and surgeon frustration. Methods to decrease these delays are important not only for patient care, but to maximize operating room resource utilization. The purpose of this study was to determine the root cause of operating room delays in a standardized manner to help improve overall operating room efficiency. Methods We performed a single-center prospective observational study analy...
19 CitationsSource
#1Alex B. Haynes (Harvard University)H-Index: 21
#2Thomas G. Weiser (UC Davis: University of California, Davis)H-Index: 30
Last. Atul A. Gawande (Harvard University)H-Index: 60
view all 16 authors...
The rate of death was 1.5% before the checklist was introduced and declined to 0.8% afterward (P = 0.003). Inpatient complications occurred in 11.0% of patients at baseline and in 7.0% after introduction of the checklist (P<0.001). Conclusions Implementation of the checklist was associated with concomitant reductions in the rates of death and complications among patients at least 16 years of age who were undergoing noncardiac surgery in a diverse group of hospitals.
3,171 CitationsSource
#1Leora I. HorwitzH-Index: 31
#2Harlan M. KrumholzH-Index: 170
Last. Stephen J. HuotH-Index: 21
view all 4 authors...
Background Transfer of responsibility for patient care between physicians is a key process in the care of hospitalized patients. Systems of transfer management and transfer frequency may affect clinical outcomes. Methods To characterize the systems by which patient information is transferred (“signed out”) between resident physicians in internal medicine residency programs and to determine the impact of recently enacted resident work-hour regulations on the frequency of transfers, we mailed a se...
247 CitationsSource
Cited By3
Newest
Source
#1John M. Karamichalis (UTHSC: University of Tennessee Health Science Center)H-Index: 1
Source
#1Anthony W. Kim (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 26
#2Elizabeth A. David (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 9
Source