Assessing the role of subjective judgment and science in environmental impact assessment: implications and options for reform
Volume: 63, Issue: 10, Pages: 1771 - 1790
Published: Dec 4, 2019
Abstract
Most environmental assessment (EA) processes are based on a rational technocratic paradigm, in which experts are expected to review value-neutral scientific evidence and objectively assess project impacts. Critics argue that this model is flawed even with increased public participation because it does not recognize the significant role of subjectivity in EA and assumes that expert analysis and judgement can be objective and value free. This...
Paper Details
Title
Assessing the role of subjective judgment and science in environmental impact assessment: implications and options for reform
Published Date
Dec 4, 2019
Volume
63
Issue
10
Pages
1771 - 1790
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History