Disagreeing on whether we agree

Our central message is that the sufficiency of evidence concerning supervised consumption sites (SCS) depends on the type of decision being made and the perspective of the decision-maker (e.g. academic, advocate or allocator of resources). Belackova et al. 1 seem to dismiss the notion of resource constraints and criticize over-reliance on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which is generally consistent with the perspective we called...