Reply to: “Comment on – A multi-center study of entecavir vs. tenofovir on prognosis of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B in the Republic of Korea”
Abstract
Comment on – A multi-center study of entecavir vs. tenofovir on prognosis of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B in the Republic of KoreaJournal of HepatologyVol. 72Issue 1PreviewWe read with great interest the article, ‘A multi-center study of entecavir vs. tenofovir on prognosis of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B in the Republic of Korea’ by Kim et al., published in the Journal of Hepatology.1 The authors concluded that the risk of...
Paper Details
Title
Reply to: “Comment on – A multi-center study of entecavir vs. tenofovir on prognosis of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B in the Republic of Korea”
Published Date
Jan 1, 2020
Journal
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
198 - 199
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History