A Reply to the Comment by Kostrovitsky, S. and Yakovlev, D. on ‘Was Crustal Contamination Involved in the Formation of the Serpentine-free Udachnaya-East Kimberlite? New Insights into Parental Melts, Liquidus Assemblage and Effects of Alteration’ by Abersteiner et al. (J. Petrology, 59, 1467–1492, 2018)

Volume: 60, Issue: 9, Pages: 1841 - 1847
Published: Sep 1, 2019
Abstract
The Comment by Kostrovitsky & Yakovlev aims to demonstrate that Abersteiner et al. (2018) ‘presented erroneous statements regarding the genesis’ of the mineralogically and geochemically unique Serpentine-Free Udachnaya-East (SFUE) kimberlite (Russia) as it contradicts the views presented by Kostrovitsky et al. (2013). Furthermore, these authors reassert that ‘the supposition that surfaces salts and sulphates represent the main source for Na–Cl–S...
Paper Details
Title
A Reply to the Comment by Kostrovitsky, S. and Yakovlev, D. on ‘Was Crustal Contamination Involved in the Formation of the Serpentine-free Udachnaya-East Kimberlite? New Insights into Parental Melts, Liquidus Assemblage and Effects of Alteration’ by Abersteiner et al. (J. Petrology, 59, 1467–1492, 2018)
Published Date
Sep 1, 2019
Volume
60
Issue
9
Pages
1841 - 1847
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.