Perceptions of a Polarized Court: How Division among Justices Shapes the Supreme Court’s Public Image. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 2018. 198 pp. $94.50 (cloth). $32.95 (paper)
Abstract
Conventional wisdom holds that unanimously decided U.S. Supreme Court cases will garner greater public acceptance. Alternatively, a slightly different version of this wisdom is that larger majorities are better than smaller majorities when it comes to public acceptance of Court decisions. This wisdom pervades scholarship on public opinion of the Court, models of Court decision-making, and, at least anecdotally, the justices themselves. In...
Paper Details
Title
Perceptions of a Polarized Court: How Division among Justices Shapes the Supreme Court’s Public Image. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 2018. 198 pp. $94.50 (cloth). $32.95 (paper)
Published Date
Jan 1, 2019
Journal
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
839 - 841
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History