Match!

Where does ethnic concentration matter for populist radical right support? An analysis of geographical scale and the halo effect

Published on Mar 1, 2020in Political Geography3.06
· DOI :10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102097
Daniël van Wijk1
Estimated H-index: 1
(UG: University of Groningen),
Gideon Bolt21
Estimated H-index: 21
(UU: Utrecht University),
Jochem Tolsma14
Estimated H-index: 14
(Radboud University Nijmegen)
Abstract
Abstract It is often hypothesised that the share of the population in an area belonging to an ethnic minority group positively influences the support for populist radical right-wing parties among native residents. However, empirical tests of this relationship have yielded mixed results, which may be a result of the wide variety of geographical scales at which ethnic concentration has been measured. Furthermore, it may be that it is the spatial distribution of minorities within the residential area that matters for radical right support, rather than their overall group size. The present study examines these issues by constructing egohoods and halos of varying sizes around respondents' homes. Connecting survey data from the Netherlands Longitudinal Lifecourse Study to detailed geographical data on ethnic concentration, it is found that support for the Dutch PVV is high in areas with low shares of minorities and decreases in areas with higher minority shares, up to a tipping point when minorities make up around 25% of the population. When shares of ethnic minorities become even larger, we tentatively conclude that support for the PVV increases again. This observed U-shaped pattern is consistent across distance-based egohoods ranging in radii from 200 to 5000 m, population-based egohoods with between 4000 and 120000 inhabitants, and administrative neighbourhoods, districts, and municipalities. Additionally, this study found that, in urban areas, native residents of relatively homogenous neighbourhoods whose surrounding area – the ‘halo’ – harbours a pronounced cluster of minority residents are more likely to support the radical right.
  • References (55)
  • Citations (0)
References55
Newest
#1Nema Dean (Glas.: University of Glasgow)H-Index: 11
#2Guanpeng DongH-Index: 9
Last.Gwilym PryceH-Index: 14
view all 4 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Jing Yao (Glas.: University of Glasgow)H-Index: 8
#2David W. S. Wong (GMU: George Mason University)H-Index: 29
Last.Jonathan Minton (Glas.: University of Glasgow)H-Index: 9
view all 4 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Daniël van Wijk (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 1
#2Gideon Bolt (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 21
Last.Ron JohnstonH-Index: 51
view all 3 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Eric P. Kaufmann (Birkbeck, University of London)H-Index: 18
#2Matthew J. Goodwin (UKC: University of Kent)H-Index: 19
6 CitationsSource
#1A. Petrovic (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 1
#2Maarten van HamLee (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 34
Last.David Manley (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 22
view all 3 authors...
7 CitationsSource
#1E.A. Lisanne de Blok (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 1
#2Tom van der Meer (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 18
3 CitationsSource
#1Jochem van Noord (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)H-Index: 1
#2Willem de Koster (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 10
Last.Jeroen van der Waal (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 13
view all 3 authors...
2 CitationsSource
#1Eva Andersson (Stockholm University)H-Index: 24
#2Bo Malmberg (Stockholm University)H-Index: 23
Last.Helga A. G. de Valk (UG: University of Groningen)H-Index: 5
view all 6 authors...
12 CitationsSource
#1Noemi MartigH-Index: 1
#2Julian BernauerH-Index: 9
1 CitationsSource
#1Eric P. Kaufmann (Birkbeck, University of London)H-Index: 18
16 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest