Original paper
Points to consider regarding DSM alternatives – Authors' reply
Abstract
We thank Chris Bervoets and colleagues for their comments. We share their concerns about classifications in contemporary psychiatric practice, but we take issue with some of their comments. First, psychiatrists did have a clear effect on the process of writing the report. The DSM working group consisted of a broad range of mental health experts, including three clinical psychiatrists. As is customary in the Belgian Health Council (BHC), these...
Paper Details
Title
Points to consider regarding DSM alternatives – Authors' reply
Published Date
Nov 1, 2019
Journal
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
895 - 895
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History