Match!

Is choice blindness a case of self-ignorance?

Published on 2019in Synthese1.26
· DOI :10.1007/s11229-019-02414-3
Lisa Bortolotti15
Estimated H-index: 15
,
Ema Sullivan-Bissett3
Estimated H-index: 3
Abstract
When subject to the choice-blindness effect, an agent gives reasons for making choice B, moments after making the alternative choice A. Choice blindness has been studied in a variety of contexts, from consumer choice and aesthetic judgement to moral and political attitudes. The pervasiveness and robustness of the effect is regarded as powerful evidence of self-ignorance. Here we compare two interpretations of choice blindness. On the choice error interpretation, when the agent gives reasons she is in fact wrong about what her choice is. On the choice change interpretation, when the agent gives reasons she is right about what her choice is, but she does not realise that her choice has changed. In this paper, we spell out the implications of the two interpretations of the choice-blindness effect for self-ignorance claims and offer some reasons to prefer choice change to choice error.
  • References (25)
  • Citations (0)
References25
Newest
Sep 1, 2018 in ACCS (Conference Cognitive Science)
#1Thomas Strandberg (Lund University)H-Index: 2
#2David Sivén (Lund University)
Last.Philip Pärnamets (Lund University)H-Index: 4
view all 5 authors...
#1Lars Hall (Lund University)H-Index: 12
#2Petter Johansson (Uppsala University)H-Index: 13
Last.Thomas Strandberg (Lund University)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
#1Lars Hall (Lund University)H-Index: 12
#2Petter Johansson (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 13
Last.Thérèse Deutgen (Lund University)H-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
Cited By0
Newest
View next paperThe Magic Moral Survey: Choice blindness in the moral domain