Match!

Is choice blindness a case of self-ignorance?

Published on Sep 28, 2019in Synthese1.262
· DOI :10.1007/s11229-019-02414-3
Lisa Bortolotti16
Estimated H-index: 16
(University of Birmingham),
Ema Sullivan-Bissett4
Estimated H-index: 4
(University of Birmingham)
Sources
Abstract
When subject to the choice-blindness effect, an agent gives reasons for making choice B, moments after making the alternative choice A. Choice blindness has been studied in a variety of contexts, from consumer choice and aesthetic judgement to moral and political attitudes. The pervasiveness and robustness of the effect is regarded as powerful evidence of self-ignorance. Here we compare two interpretations of choice blindness. On the choice error interpretation, when the agent gives reasons she is in fact wrong about what her choice is. On the choice change interpretation, when the agent gives reasons she is right about what her choice is, but she does not realise that her choice has changed. In this paper, we spell out the implications of the two interpretations of the choice-blindness effect for self-ignorance claims and offer some reasons to prefer choice change to choice error.
  • References (27)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2009
2012
3 Authors (Petter Johansson, ..., Nick Chater)
15 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References27
Newest
Sep 1, 2018 in ACCS (Conference Cognitive Science)
#1Thomas Strandberg (Lund University)H-Index: 2
#2David Sivén (Lund University)H-Index: 1
Last. Philip Pärnamets (Lund University)H-Index: 4
view all 5 authors...
In times of increasing polarization and political acrimony, fueled by distrust of government and media disinformation, it is ever more important to understand the cognitive mechanisms behind political attitude change. In two experiments, we present evidence that false beliefs about one's own prior attitudes and confabulatory reasoning can lead to lasting changes in political attitudes. In Experiment 1 (N = 140), participants stated their opinions about salient political issues, and using the Cho...
2 CitationsSource
In this paper I discuss the costs and benefits of confabulation, focusing on the type of confabulation people engage in when they offer explanations for their attitudes and choices. What makes confabulation costly? In the philosophical literature confabulation is thought to undermine claims to self-knowledge. I argue that when people confabulate they do not necessarily fail at mental-state self-attributions, but offer ill-grounded explanations which often lead to the adoption of other ill-ground...
8 CitationsSource
Abstract In this paper I explore the nature of confabulatory explanations of action guided by implicit bias. I claim that such explanations can have significant epistemic benefits in spite of their obvious epistemic costs, and that such benefits are not otherwise obtainable by the subject at the time at which the explanation is offered. I start by outlining the kinds of cases I have in mind, before characterising the phenomenon of confabulation by focusing on a few common features. Then I introd...
23 CitationsSource
#1Robin Scaife (University of Sheffield)H-Index: 3
There is a widespread assumption that we have direct access to our own decision-making processes. Empirical demonstrations of confabulation, a phenomenon where individuals construct and themselves believe plausible but inaccurate accounts of why they acted, have been used to question this assumption. Those defending the assumption argue cases of confabulation are relatively rare and that in most cases, we still have direct insight into our own decision-making. This paper reviews this debate and ...
9 CitationsSource
Abstract The current study investigates what happens with participants’ attitudes toward their romantic relation when they are successively asked to list the motives for which they are involved in that relation and to discuss them. Participants ( N = 24), involved in a relation for more than two years, took part in a three Session experiment in which they had to rate their satisfaction with the relation. The results show that repeated introspection on the romantic relation generates attitudinal ...
1 CitationsSource
#1Lars Hall (Lund University)H-Index: 13
#2Thomas Strandberg (Lund University)H-Index: 2
Last. Petter Johansson (Uppsala University)H-Index: 13
view all 6 authors...
Political candidates often believe they must focus their campaign efforts on a small number of swing voters open for ideological change. Based on the wisdom of opinion polls, this might seem like a good idea. But do most voters really hold their political attitudes so firmly that they are unreceptive to persuasion? We tested this premise during the most recent general election in Sweden, in which a left- and a right-wing coalition were locked in a close race. We asked our participants to state t...
42 CitationsSource
#1Lars Hall (Lund University)H-Index: 13
#2Petter Johansson (Uppsala University)H-Index: 13
Last. Thomas Strandberg (Lund University)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
Every day, thousands of polls, surveys, and rating scales are employed to elicit the attitudes of humankind. Given the ubiquitous use of these instruments, it seems we ought to have firm answers to what is measured by them, but unfortunately we do not. To help remedy this situation, we present a novel approach to investigate the nature of attitudes. We created a self-transforming paper survey of moral opinions, covering both foundational principles, and current dilemmas hotly debated in the medi...
71 CitationsSource
#1Lars Hall (Lund University)H-Index: 13
#2Petter Johansson (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 13
Last. Thérèse Deutgen (Lund University)H-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
We set up a tasting venue at a local supermarket and invited passerby shoppers to sample two different varieties of jam and tea, and to decide which alternative in each pair they preferred the most. Immediately after the participants had made their choice, we asked them to again sample the chosen alternative, and to verbally explain why they chose the way they did. At this point we secretly switched the contents of the sample containers, so that the outcome of the choice became the opposite of w...
95 CitationsSource
#1Martha Turner (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 11
#2Max Coltheart (Macquarie University)H-Index: 76
Confabulations and delusions both involve the production of false claims. Although they may have different types of content, they share several characteristics. For example, they are often held with considerable conviction and are resistant to counter evidence, they may be acted upon, and they may be accompanied by a lack of concern about the false claim or its implications. Confabulations and delusions may initially arise from failures in different systems (e.g., mnemonic vs. perceptual or affe...
67 CitationsSource
#1Lisa Bortolotti (University of Birmingham)H-Index: 16
There is an apparent tension in current accounts of the relationship between reason giving and self-knowledge. Philosophers like Richard Moran (2001) claim that deliberation and justification can give rise to first-person authority over the attitudes that subjects form or defend on the basis of what they take to be their best reasons. On the other hand, the psychological evidence on introspection effects and the literature on elusive reasons suggest that engaging in explicit deliberation or just...
7 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest