Match!

What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018

Published on Dec 1, 2019in Scientometrics2.77
· DOI :10.1007/S11192-019-03243-4
Iman Tahamtan6
Estimated H-index: 6
(UT: University of Tennessee),
Lutz Bornmann51
Estimated H-index: 51
(MPG: Max Planck Society)
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to update the review of Bornmann and Daniel (J Doc 64(1):45–80, 2008) presenting a narrative review of studies on citations in scientific documents. The current review covers 41 studies published between 2006 and 2018. Bornmann and Daniel (2008) focused on earlier years. The current review describes the (new) studies on citation content and context analyses as well as the studies that explore the citation motivation of scholars through surveys or interviews. One focus in this paper is on the technical developments in the last decade, such as the richer meta-data available and machine-readable formats of scientific papers. These developments have resulted in citation context analyses of large datasets in comprehensive studies (which was not possible previously). Many studies in recent years have used computational and machine learning techniques to determine citation functions and polarities, some of which have attempted to overcome the methodological weaknesses of previous studies. The automated recognition of citation functions seems to have the potential to greatly enhance citation indices and information retrieval capabilities. Our review of the empirical studies demonstrates that a paper may be cited for very different scientific and non-scientific reasons. This result accords with the finding by Bornmann and Daniel (2008). The current review also shows that to better understand the relationship between citing and cited documents, a variety of features should be analyzed, primarily the citation context, the semantics and linguistic patterns in citations, citation locations within the citing document, and citation polarity (negative, neutral, positive).
  • References (85)
  • Citations (11)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
677 Citations
2015
2 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References85
Newest
: Objective: In recent years, citation analysis tools provide many devices for finding or computing the citation score or impact factor for journals. It is important for the researchers to identify good journals for collecting research ideas discussed. A journal with a good impact factor value is preferably referred to by many researchers. In this research work, the author proposes a system for ranking journals on the basis of ideas and results cited in other papers. Methods: The work involves t...
2 CitationsSource
#1Aurora González-Teruel (University of Valencia)H-Index: 6
#2Maria Abad-Garcia (University of Valencia)H-Index: 5
The range of theoretical frameworks currently being used by researchers into information behaviour is abundant and diverse. We need to examine thoroughly the contribution of theories and models to further research, as this would help to improve future investigations in the field. This paper adopts this approach, by thoroughly examining the influence that Elfreda Chatman’s three middle-range theories have had on subsequent research. A citation context analysis was carried out on the basis of thos...
2 CitationsSource
#1Abdallah Yousif (BIT: Beijing Institute of Technology)H-Index: 5
#2Zhendong Niu (BIT: Beijing Institute of Technology)H-Index: 6
Last. Ally S. Nyamawe (BIT: Beijing Institute of Technology)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
In the recent years, there has been an increased availability of scientific publications across the world connected through citations. To help analyze this huge amount of information, citation classification has been introduced to identify the opinions and purposes of the authors for citing earlier works. Existing approaches utilize machine learning techniques and report promising results in identifying the sentiment and purpose of the citations. However, most of the previous approaches tackle t...
3 CitationsSource
#1Khadidja Bakhti (BIT: Beijing Institute of Technology)H-Index: 2
#2Zhendong Niu (BIT: Beijing Institute of Technology)H-Index: 6
Last. Ally S. Nyamawe (BIT: Beijing Institute of Technology)H-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
In recent years, there has been significant growth in the use of citation to improve the methods of evaluating the quality of publications. To determine the quality of the publications, traditional methods such as impact factor depend only on the citation count. Recently, citation functions or purposes have gained attention to evaluate the quality of these methods. Citation function classification is defined as a way to find out the reasons behind quoting previous literature. Several approaches ...
4 CitationsSource
#1Kayvan Kousha (University of Wolverhampton)H-Index: 24
#2Mike Thelwall (University of Wolverhampton)H-Index: 67
Abstract Despite recent evidence that Microsoft Academic is an extensive source of citation counts for journal articles, it is not known if the same is true for academic books. This paper fills this gap by comparing citations to 16,463 books from 2013 to 2016 in the Book Citation Index (BKCI) against automatically extracted citations from Microsoft Academic and Google Books in 17 fields. About 60% of the BKCI books had records in Microsoft Academic, varying by year and field. Citation counts fro...
4 CitationsSource
#1Iman Tahamtan (UT: University of Tennessee)H-Index: 6
#2Lutz Bornmann (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 51
Abstract Several authors have proposed that a large number of unusual combinations of cited references in a paper point to its high creative potential (or novelty). However, it is still not clear whether the number of unusual combinations can really measure the creative potential of papers. The current study addresses this question on the basis of several case studies from the field of scientometrics. We identified some landmark papers in this field. Study subjects were the corresponding authors...
12 CitationsSource
#1Khadidja Bakhti (BIT: Beijing Institute of Technology)H-Index: 2
#2Zhendong Niu (BIT: Beijing Institute of Technology)H-Index: 9
Last. Ally S. Nyamawe (BIT: Beijing Institute of Technology)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Saeed-Ul Hassan (Information Technology University)H-Index: 13
#2Iqra Safder (Information Technology University)H-Index: 4
Last. Faisal Kamiran (Information Technology University)H-Index: 11
view all 4 authors...
We measure the knowledge flows between countries by analysing publication and citation data, arguing that not all citations are equally important. Therefore, in contrast to existing techniques that utilize absolute citation counts to quantify knowledge flows between different entities, our model employs a citation context analysis technique, using a machine-learning approach to distinguish between important and non-important citations. We use 14 novel features (including context-based, cue words...
6 CitationsSource
#1Chi-Shiou Lin (NTU: National Taiwan University)H-Index: 7
Citation analyses are based on two questionable assumptions that significantly influence the value of citation count: the equal contribution assumption (i.e., each citation contributes equally to the citing paper) and the positive endorsement assumption (i.e., each citation is viewed as an endorsement from the citing paper to the cited work). This study employed a citation context analysis approach to examine the distributions of essential versus perfunctory citations as well as confirmative ver...
3 CitationsSource
Abstract The top 1000 biomedical papers by number of citations are classified by method, type of method and non-methods by examination of citation contexts. Supervised machine learning is applied to the context data for a training sample of papers which is then used to classify the full list, revealing that words indicating utility are most important for the classification of methods. Further word analysis is carried out using corpus linguistics to uncover context words that characterize non-met...
11 CitationsSource
Cited By11
Newest
#1Lutz Bornmann (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 51
Last. George ChackoH-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
Recently, Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019) proposed a new family of indicators, which measure whether a scientific publication is disruptive to a field or tradition of research. Such disruptive influence...
Source
#1Ludo Waltman (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 41
#2Vincent A. Traag (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 15
Most scientometricians reject the use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles and their authors. The well-known San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment also strongly objects against this way of using the impact factor. Arguments against the use of the impact factor at the level of individual articles are often based on statistical considerations. The skewness of journal citation distributions typically plays a central role in these arguments. We present a theoreti...
Source
#1Lutz Bornmann (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 51
#2K. Brad Wray (AU: Aarhus University)H-Index: 15
Last. Robin Haunschild (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 20
view all 3 authors...
In recent years, the full text of papers are increasingly available electronically which opens up the possibility of quantitatively investigating citation contexts in more detail. In this study, we introduce a new form of citation analysis, which we call citation concept analysis (CCA). CCA is intended to reveal the cognitive impact certain concepts—published in a highly-cited landmark publication—have on the citing authors. It counts the number of times the concepts are mentioned (cited) in the...
Source
#1Martin SzomszorH-Index: 2
Last. Jonathan AdamsH-Index: 8
view all 3 authors...
1 CitationsSource
Objective: This study evaluated the bibliometric data of the most common publication types of the neuroimaging literature. Methods: PubMed was searched to identify all published papers with “neuroimaging” as their MeSH Major Topics, and they were further searched by the following publication types: case report, clinical trial, comparative study, editorial, evaluation study, guideline, meta-analysis, multicenter study, randomized controlled trial, review, technical report, and validation study. T...
Source
#1Charles Crothers (AUT: Auckland University of Technology)H-Index: 4
#2Lutz Bornmann (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 51
Last. Robin Haunschild (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 20
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Paulo Henrique Santos Gonçalves (UFPE: Federal University of Pernambuco)H-Index: 2
#2Thiago Gonçalves-Souza (UFRPE: Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco)H-Index: 10
Last. Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque (UFPE: Federal University of Pernambuco)H-Index: 47
view all 3 authors...
Chronic anthropogenic disturbances is a research topic of increasing interest for ecologists. We conducted a bibliometric assesssment about the literature on this subject in oder to identify some gaps concerning the ecological approaches, the kinds of organisms, disturbances, environments, and ecological zones studied, and to understand the factors influencing the citations and self-citations behaviours in this field. We examined the additive effect of the auhors-related variables (the hightest ...
Source
Source
Analyses of faculty citation activity usually focus on counts as a function of author characteristics, such as rank, gender, previous citation levels, and other factors influencing productivity and career path. Citation analyses of publications consider aspects, such as the number of authors, author reputation, author order, length of the title, methodology, and impact factors of the publication. While publication topics or discipline is considered important factors, they are more difficult to a...
Source
Source