Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Mentoring Program
Abstract
A continuous cycle of mixed-methods assessment contributes to the success of a mentoring program, as shown in this case study from a large academic library. Assessment instruments include the mentoring competencies assessment, the fear of negative evaluation scale, a satisfaction survey and a focus group. Assessment results reveal that the mentoring program is meeting its goals of contributing to the professional development of protégés,...
Paper Details
Title
Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Mentoring Program
Published Date
Sep 16, 2019
Volume
59
Issue
8
Pages
873 - 902
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History