(5′R)-and (5′S)-purine 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyribonucleosides: reality or artifactual measurements? A reply to Chatgilialoglu’s comments (this issue)
Abstract
This rebuttal letter is aimed at refuting the poor and false arguments elaborated by Chatgilialoglu (preceding article) in his response to the position article (Cadet et al. Free Radic Res 2019;53:574-577) that focussed on the putative reliability of the HPLC-MS/MS measurements of five radiation-induced damage to cellular DNA, which included 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyadenosine and the (5'R) and (5'S) diastereomers of 5',8-cyclo-2'-deoxyadenosine...
Paper Details
Title
(5′R)-and (5′S)-purine 5′,8-cyclo-2′-deoxyribonucleosides: reality or artifactual measurements? A reply to Chatgilialoglu’s comments (this issue)
Published Date
Sep 25, 2019
Journal
Volume
53
Issue
9-10
Pages
1014 - 1018
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History