Validity of Using Cancer Registry Data in Comparative Effectiveness Research Involving Radiation Therapy

Volume: 105, Issue: 1, Pages: S182 - S183
Published: Sep 1, 2019
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials represent the gold standard in comparative effectiveness research, yet many clinical scenarios lack randomized data therefore turning researchers to analyses using other data sources. A large body of comparative effectiveness research uses cancer registry data to compare survival among different treatments. However, the non-randomized nature of these analyses is subject to potential confounding and selection bias. The...
Paper Details
Title
Validity of Using Cancer Registry Data in Comparative Effectiveness Research Involving Radiation Therapy
Published Date
Sep 1, 2019
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
S182 - S183
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.