Terrestrial adult stages of freshwater insects are sensitive to insecticides

Published on Jan 1, 2020in Chemosphere5.11
· DOI :10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124799
Marianne Bruus5
Estimated H-index: 5
(AU: Aarhus University),
Jes J. Rasmussen19
Estimated H-index: 19
(AU: Aarhus University)
+ 6 AuthorsPeter Wiberg-Larsen14
Estimated H-index: 14
(AU: Aarhus University)
View in Source
Abstract Terrestrial adult stages of freshwater insects may be exposed to pesticides by wind drift, over-spray, contact or feeding. However, studies addressing insecticide effects on freshwater invertebrates focus primarily on the impact of pesticides reaching the streams and potentially harming the aquatic juvenile stages. This is also reflected in the current risk assessment procedures, which do not include testing of adult freshwater insects. In order to assess the potential impact of insecticides on adult stages of freshwater insects, we exposed six common species to the insecticides Karate (lambda-cyhalothrin) and Confidor (imidacloprid). Dose-response relations were established, and LD50 estimates were compared to those of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), which is the standard terrestrial test insect when pesticides are evaluated prior to commercial release. Generally, the tested species were more sensitive to the studied insecticides than the honey bee. In order to examine whether the sensitivity of adult stages of freshwater insects corresponds with the sensitivity of the juvenile stages of the same species, the ranking of the two life stages with respect to the toxicity of Karate was compared, revealing some correspondence, but also some dissimilarities. Our results strongly indicate that terrestrial adult stages of aquatic insects are not adequately protected by current risk assessment procedures.
  • References (50)
  • Citations (0)
#1Jes J. Rasmussen (AU: Aarhus University)H-Index: 19
#2Peter Wiberg-Larsen (AU: Aarhus University)H-Index: 14
Last.Morten Tune Strandberg (AU: Aarhus University)H-Index: 13
view all 7 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Melanie RabyH-Index: 2
#2Monica Nowierski (Japanese Ministry of the Environment)H-Index: 1
Last.Paul K. SibleyH-Index: 28
view all 7 authors...
27 CitationsSource
#1Caspar A. Hallmann (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 7
#2Martin SorgH-Index: 1
Last.Hans de Kroon (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 46
view all 12 authors...
388 CitationsSource
15 CitationsSource
#1Arthur David (University of Sussex)H-Index: 14
#2Cristina Botías (University of Sussex)H-Index: 22
Last.Dave Goulson (University of Sussex)H-Index: 64
view all 7 authors...
106 CitationsSource
#1Ohad Zivan (Technion – Israel Institute of Technology)H-Index: 3
#2M. Segal-Rosenheimer (ARC: Ames Research Center)H-Index: 10
Last.Yael Dubowski (Technion – Israel Institute of Technology)H-Index: 18
view all 3 authors...
15 CitationsSource
164 CitationsSource
#1Yanyan Chi (SDAU: Shandong Agricultural University)H-Index: 1
#2Kang Qiao (SDAU: Shandong Agricultural University)H-Index: 11
Last.Kaiyun Wang (SDAU: Shandong Agricultural University)H-Index: 15
view all 5 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Christy A. Morrissey (U of S: University of Saskatchewan)H-Index: 24
#2James H. Devries (Ducks Unlimited)H-Index: 17
Last.K arsten Liber (U of S: University of Saskatchewan)H-Index: 1
view all 6 authors...
292 CitationsSource
#1Alf AagaardH-Index: 3
#2Theo C.M. BrockH-Index: 33
Last.T. van der LindenH-Index: 3
view all 7 authors...
13 CitationsSource
Cited By0
View next paperEffects of malathion and carbendazim on Amazonian freshwater organisms: comparison of tropical and temperate species sensitivity distributions