Match!

Bias averted: personality may not influence trappability

Published on Aug 21, 2019in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology2.103
· DOI :10.1007/S00265-019-2742-4
Chris J. Jolly2
Estimated H-index: 2
(University of Melbourne),
Jonathan K. Webb38
Estimated H-index: 38
(UTS: University of Technology, Sydney)
+ 2 AuthorsBen L. Phillips31
Estimated H-index: 31
(University of Melbourne)
Abstract
If bold animals are more likely to be trapped than shy animals, we take a biased sample of personalities—a problem for behavioural research. Such a bias is problematic, also, for population estimation using mark-recapture models that assume homogeneity in detection probabilities. In this study, we investigated whether differences in boldness result in differences in detection probability in a native Australian rodent, the grassland melomys (Melomys burtoni). During a mark-recapture study of this species, we used modified open field tests to assess the boldness (via emergence, and interaction with a novel object) of melomys trapped on the last night of four trapping nights in each of two trapping sessions. Despite melomys showing repeatable variation in these behavioural traits, neither boldness nor emergence latency had an effect on detection probability, and we found no evidence that detection probability varied between individuals. This result suggests that any neophobia is experienced and resolved in individuals of this species on a scale of minutes, rather than the hours across which traps are made available each night. Our work demonstrates that personality-caused sampling bias may not be inevitable, even in situations where animals are required to respond to novelty to be detected, such as in baited traps. Heterogeneity in personality does not inevitably lead to heterogeneity in detection probability. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Historically, passive traps were assumed a non-biased means of sampling animal populations. Increasingly behavioural ecologists suggest that personality traits, particularly individual boldness, may influence behaviour and, as a consequence, could result in sampling bias. Here, we present a comprehensive example of when animal personality has no effect on detection probability. Despite having distinct personalities, detection probabilities of a native Australian rodent, grassland melomys Melomys burtoni, were not influenced by whether they were ‘shy’ or ‘bold’. We provide evidence that heterogeneity in personality does not inevitably lead to heterogeneity in detection probability. Given that population estimation models typically assume homogeneity in detection probability between individuals, if this is a broad phenomenon, consistently similar results may improve our confidence in this assumption.
  • References (58)
  • Citations (1)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
35 Citations
2015
1 Author (James R. White)
2 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References58
Newest
#1Georgia Ward-Fear (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 8
Last. Richard Shine (Macquarie University)H-Index: 101
view all 5 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Petri T. Niemelä (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 17
#2Niels J. Dingemanse (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 48
Since the early 21st century, behavioural ecologists have increasingly focused on the ecology and evolution of repeatable individual differences in behaviour (aka ‘animal personality’). More and more studies have investigated correlations between behaviour(s) and other phenotypic traits, thereby seeking to understand among-individual variation in behaviour from either a proximate or an ultimate perspective. Statistically, such studies require the estimation of among-individual correlations, nece...
10 CitationsSource
#1Bram Vanden Broecke (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 3
#2Benny Borremans (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 15
Last. H. Leirsa (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 1
view all 7 authors...
: Exploration and activity are often described as trade-offs between the fitness benefits of gathering information and resources, and the potential costs of increasing exposure to predators and parasites. More exploratory individuals are predicted to have higher rates of parasitism, but this relationship has rarely been examined for virus infections in wild populations. Here, we used the multimammate mouse Mastomys natalensis to investigate the relationship between exploration, activity, and inf...
3 CitationsSource
#1Martin A. Stoffel (Bielefeld University)H-Index: 6
#2Shinichi Nakagawa (UNSW: University of New South Wales)H-Index: 71
Last. Holger Schielzeth (Bielefeld University)H-Index: 26
view all 3 authors...
Summary Intra-class correlations (ICC) and repeatabilities (R) are fundamental statistics for quantifying the reproducibility of measurements and for understanding the structure of biological variation. Linear mixed effects models offer a versatile framework for estimating ICC and R. However, while point estimation and significance testing by likelihood ratio tests is straightforward, the quantification of uncertainty is not as easily achieved. A further complication arises when the analysis is ...
209 CitationsSource
#1Daniel Perals (Autonomous University of Barcelona)H-Index: 1
#2Andrea S. Griffin (University of Newcastle)H-Index: 24
Last. Daniel Sol (Autonomous University of Barcelona)H-Index: 40
view all 4 authors...
Animal personality has become a major topic in animal behaviour. Much recent progress has come from the use of the open-field test, which is routinely used to separate individuals into fast and slow explorers. However, there is no standard way to conduct the test and it is unclear whether the test really measures exploration. Here, we addressed these issues by combining an open-field test with a battery of independent assays intended to assess the convergent and discriminant validity of the beha...
33 CitationsSource
#1Marcus Michelangeli (Monash University)H-Index: 9
#2Bob B. M. Wong (Monash University)H-Index: 32
Last. David G. Chapple (Monash University)H-Index: 28
view all 3 authors...
35 CitationsSource
#1Christie Le Cœur (University of Paris-Sud)H-Index: 2
#2Martin Thibault (University of Paris-Sud)H-Index: 1
Last. Emmanuelle Baudry (University of Paris-Sud)H-Index: 19
view all 6 authors...
Over the past decade, it has been recognized that in many animal species, individuals present consistent behavioral differences across time and/or contexts, thus defining personality traits. A general relationship seems to exist between personality and fitness in wild populations, which raises the question as to how variation in personality is maintained in the presence of selection. Fluctuating selection associated with a heterogeneous environment could contribute to maintaining personality var...
23 CitationsSource
Personality is at the forefront of current behavioral ecological research. Most research concerns boldness, aggressiveness, activity, exploratory tendency, and sociability. However, many species may exhibit consistent variation in other traits, which the current research problematically misses. Exclusive adherence to the five traits ignores the possibility that other traits may be more consequential for a species and limits our understanding of the personality trait repertoire and the potentiall...
31 CitationsSource
#1William E. Cooper (IPFW: Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne)H-Index: 48
#2R. Alexander Pyron (GW: George Washington University)H-Index: 36
Last. Theodore Garland (UC: University of California)H-Index: 81
view all 3 authors...
One of Darwin's most widely known conjectures is that prey are tame on remote islands, where mammalian predators are absent. Many species appear to permit close approach on such islands, but no comparative studies have demonstrated reduced wariness quantified as flight initiation distance (FID; i.e. predator–prey distance when the prey begins to flee) in comparison with mainland relatives. We used the phylogenetic comparative method to assess influence of distance from the mainland and island ar...
48 CitationsSource
#1Erica F. Stuber (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 7
#2Yimen Gerardo Araya-Ajoy (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 13
Last. Niels J. Dingemanse (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 48
view all 8 authors...
Sampling bias is a key issue to consider when designing studies to address biological questions and its importance has been widely discussed in the literature. However, some forms of bias remain underestimated. We investigated the roosting decisions of free-living great tits utilizing nest-boxes in response to the installation of a novel object (a miniature video camera) inside their nest-boxes. We show that birds that score highly on a widely used exploration test (i.e., fast explorers) are mor...
59 CitationsSource
Cited By1
Newest
#1Chris J. Jolly (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 2
#2Adam S. Smart (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 3
Last. Ben L. Phillips (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 31
view all 6 authors...
The arrival of novel predators can trigger trophic cascades driven by shifts in prey numbers. Predators also elicit behavioural change in prey populations, via plasticity and rapid evolution, and such behavioural responses by prey may also contribute to trophic cascades. Here we document the effects of a novel predator on the behaviour and demography of a native prey species. We reveal rapid behavioural responses in the prey species (grassland melomys, a granivorous rodent) following the introdu...
Source