Match!

Power in economic games.

Published on Jun 1, 2020in Current opinion in psychology
· DOI :10.1016/J.COPSYC.2019.07.019
Eric van Dijk45
Estimated H-index: 45
(LEI: Leiden University),
Carsten K. W. De Dreu68
Estimated H-index: 68
(LEI: Leiden University),
Jörg Gross6
Estimated H-index: 6
(LEI: Leiden University)
Sources
Abstract
Economic games offer an analytic tool to examine strategic decision-making in social interactions. Here we identify four sources of power that can be captured and studied with economic games – asymmetric dependence, the possibility to reduce dependence, the ability to punish and reward, and the use of knowledge and information. We review recent studies examining these distinct forms of power, highlight that the use of economic games can benefit our understanding of the behavioral and neurobiological underpinnings of power, and illustrate how power differences within and between groups impact cooperation, exploitation, and conflict.
  • References (54)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2009
46 Citations
2 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References54
Newest
#1Erik W. de Kwaadsteniet (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 10
#2Toko Kiyonari (Aoyama Gakuin University)H-Index: 17
Last. Eric van Dijk (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 45
view all 4 authors...
Abstract The present paper investigates how rewards as well as punishments – implemented to enforce the social norm of cooperation – impact the reputations of the leaders administering them. Moreover, we investigate whether and how the effects of norm enforcement decisions on leaders' reputations change when – due to behavioral noise – they are unable to perfectly monitor group members' decisions. To address these questions, we present a new psychological perspective that uses insights from the ...
2 CitationsSource
#1Jeroen M. van Baar (Brown University)H-Index: 1
#2Luke J. Chang (Dartmouth College)H-Index: 23
Last. Alan G. Sanfey (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 37
view all 3 authors...
Individuals employ different moral principles to guide their social decision-making, thus expressing a specific ‘moral strategy’. Which computations characterize different moral strategies, and how might they be instantiated in the brain? Here, we tackle these questions in the context of decisions about reciprocity using a modified Trust Game. We show that different participants spontaneously and consistently employ different moral strategies. By mapping an integrative computational model of rec...
3 CitationsSource
#1Jörg Gross (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 6
#2Carsten K. W. De Dreu (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 68
Alone and together, climatic changes, population growth, and economic scarcity create shared problems that can be tackled effectively through cooperation and coordination. Perhaps because cooperation is fragile and easily breaks down, societies also provide individual solutions to shared problems, such as privatized healthcare or retirement planning. But how does the availability of individual solutions affect free-riding and the efficient creation of public goods? We confronted groups of indivi...
2 CitationsSource
#1Jan B. Engelmann (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 14
#2Friederike Meyer (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 2
Last. Ernst Fehr (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 101
view all 4 authors...
Aversive affect is likely a key source of irrational human decision-making, but still, little is known about the neural circuitry underlying emotion-cognition interactions during social behavior. We induced incidental aversive affect via prolonged periods of threat of shock, while 41 healthy participants made investment decisions concerning another person or a lottery. Negative affect reduced trust, suppressed trust-specific activity in the left temporoparietal junction (TPJ), and reduced functi...
4 CitationsSource
#1Sarah Rudorf (University of Bern)H-Index: 4
#2Thomas Baumgartner (University of Bern)H-Index: 21
Last. Daria Knoch (University of Bern)H-Index: 22
view all 3 authors...
The urge to rebel against external control affects social interactions in many domains of our society with potentially far-reaching consequences. Nevertheless, it has remained unclear to what degree this control-averse behavior might be influenced by the people in our surroundings, our peers. In an experimental paradigm with real restrictions of the subjects’ freedom of choice and no systematic incentives to follow the peer, we are able to demonstrate both negative and positive peer effects on c...
1 CitationsSource
#1Jörg Gross (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 6
#2Carsten K. W. De Dreu (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 68
Humans exhibit a remarkable capacity for cooperation among genetically unrelated individuals. Yet, human cooperation is neither universal, nor stable. Instead, cooperation is often bounded to members of particular groups, and such groups endogenously form or break apart. Cooperation networks are parochial and under constant reconfiguration. Here, we demonstrate how parochial cooperation networks endogenously emerge as a consequence of simple reputation heuristics people may use when deciding to ...
4 CitationsSource
#1Tessa Haesevoets (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 5
#2Dries H. Bostyn (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 5
Last. Alain Van Hiel (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 35
view all 5 authors...
The prisoner's dilemma game is a mixed-motive game that offers two players the simultaneous choice between a cooperative and a defective alternative. An often neglected aspect of such a binary-choice game, however, is that in many real-life encounters, people can choose not only to cooperate or defect, but they also have a third option: to exit the social dilemma. Although in the literature a consensus has emerged that the addition of an exit opportunity benefits cooperation, there is only scant...
1 CitationsSource
#1Jörg Gross (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 6
#2Margarita Leib (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 5
Last. Shaul Shalvi (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 20
view all 4 authors...
Corruption is often the product of coordinated rule violations. Here, we investigated how such corrupt collaboration emerges and spreads when people can choose their partners versus when they cannot. Participants were assigned a partner and could increase their payoff by coordinated lying. After several interactions, they were either free to choose whether to stay with or switch their partner or forced to stay with or switch their partner. Results reveal that both dishonest and honest people exp...
1 CitationsSource
#1Micah G. Edelson (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 7
#2Rafael Polanía (ETH Zurich)H-Index: 17
Last. Todd A. Hare (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 36
view all 5 authors...
INTRODUCTION Decisions as diverse as committing soldiers to the battlefield or picking a school for your child share a basic attribute: assuming responsibility for the outcome of others. This responsibility is inherent in the roles of prime ministers and generals, as well as in the more quotidian roles of firm managers, schoolteachers, and parents. Here we identify the underlying behavioral, computational, and neurobiological mechanisms that determine the choice to assume responsibility over oth...
6 CitationsSource
#1Fangfang Tan (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 7
#2Xiao ErteH-Index: 16
We conduct an experiment to examine the role of retribution and deterrence in motivating third party punishment. In particular, we consider how the role of these two motives may differ according to whether a third party is a group or an individual. In a one-shot prisoner’s dilemma game with third party punishment, we find groups punish more when the penalty embeds deterrence than when it can only be retributive. In contrast, individual third parties’ punishment decisions do not vary on whether t...
2 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest