Professionalizing Peer Review Suggestions for a More Ethical and Pedagogical Review Process
Abstract
Several major problems with peer review exist in the related humanities disciplines of rhetoric, communication, and composition studies: a preponderance of incompetent reviewers, a lack of constructive criticism and the maintenance of orthodoxy, relative ease in identifying blinded authors, editorial passivity, and long waits to receive reviews. We propose five solutions: training for reviewers and editors, reviewers signing their reviews,...
Paper Details
Title
Professionalizing Peer Review Suggestions for a More Ethical and Pedagogical Review Process
Published Date
Jul 1, 2019
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
248 - 264
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History