A correction: Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach
Abstract
As the volume of scientific articles has grown rapidly over the last decades, evaluating their impact becomes critical for tracing valuable and significant research output. Many studies have proposed various ranking methods to estimate the prestige of academic papers using bibliometric methods. However, the weight of the links in bibliometric networks has been rarely considered for article ranking in existing literature. Such incomplete...
Paper Details
Title
A correction: Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach
Published Date
Aug 1, 2019
Journal
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
769 - 770
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History