Match!

Perceived publication pressure in Amsterdam: Survey of all disciplinary fields and academic ranks.

Published on Jun 19, 2019in PLOS ONE2.776
· DOI :10.1371/journal.pone.0217931
Tamarinde L. Haven2
Estimated H-index: 2
(VU: VU University Amsterdam),
Lex M. Bouter140
Estimated H-index: 140
(VU: VU University Amsterdam)
+ 1 AuthorsJoeri K. Tijdink9
Estimated H-index: 9
(VU: VU University Amsterdam)
Sources
Abstract
Publications determine to a large extent the possibility to stay in academia (“publish or perish”). While some pressure to publish may incentivise high quality research, too much publication pressure is likely to have detrimental effects on both the scientific enterprise and on individual researchers. Our research question was: What is the level of perceived publication pressure in the four academic institutions in Amsterdam and does the pressure to publish differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields? Investigating researchers in Amsterdam with the revised Publication Pressure Questionnaire, we find that a negative attitude towards the current publication climate is present across academic ranks and disciplinary fields. Postdocs and assistant professors (M = 3.42) perceive the greatest publication stress and PhD-students (M = 2.44) perceive a significant lack of resources to relieve publication stress. Results indicate the need for a healthier publication climate where the quality and integrity of research is rewarded.
Figures & Tables
  • References (44)
  • Citations (2)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
30 Citations
12 Citations
20162.38BMJ Open
24 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References44
Newest
#1Tamarinde L. Haven (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 2
Last. Frans J. Oort (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 50
view all 4 authors...
The emphasis on impact factors and the quantity of publications intensifies competition between researchers. This competition was traditionally considered an incentive to produce high-quality work, but there are unwanted side-effects of this competition like publication pressure. To measure the effect of publication pressure on researchers, the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) was developed. Upon using the PPQ, some issues came to light that motivated a revision. We constructed two new s...
1 CitationsSource
Scientists with first-hand experience of rejection offer their advice. Scientists with first-hand experience of rejection offer their advice.
1 CitationsSource
#1Tamarinde L. Haven (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 2
#2Joeri K. Tijdink (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 9
Last. Lex M. Bouter (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 140
view all 4 authors...
Breaches of research integrity have shocked the academic community. Initially explanations were sought at the level of individual researchers but over time increased recognition emerged of the important role that the research integrity climate may play in influencing researchers' (mis)behavior. In this study we aim to assess whether researchers from different academic ranks and disciplinary fields experience the research integrity climate differently. We sent an online questionnaire to academic ...
2 CitationsSource
5 CitationsSource
#1K Krist Vaesen (TU/e: Eindhoven University of Technology)H-Index: 20
#2Jk Joel Katzav (UQ: University of Queensland)H-Index: 10
Scientists are increasingly dissatisfied with funding systems that rely on peer assessment and, accordingly, have suggested several proposals for reform. One of these proposals is to distribute available funds equally among all qualified researchers, with no interference from peer review. Despite its numerous benefits, such egalitarian sharing faces the objection, among others, that it would lead to an unacceptable dilution of resources. The aim of the present paper is to assess this particular ...
8 CitationsSource
#1Katia Levecque (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 16
#2Frederik Anseel (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 22
Last. Lydia GisleH-Index: 7
view all 5 authors...
Research policy observers are increasingly concerned about the potential impact of current academic working conditions on mental health, particularly in PhD students. The aim of the current study is threefold. First, we assess the prevalence of mental health problems in a representative sample of PhD students in Flanders, Belgium (N = 3659). Second, we compare PhD students to three other samples: (1) highly educated in the general population (N = 769); (2) highly educated employees (N = 592); an...
74 CitationsSource
#1Feng Shi (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 7
#2Yongren Shi (Yale University)H-Index: 5
Last. Michael W. Macy (Cornell University)H-Index: 35
view all 5 authors...
A co-purchase network analysis of data from two of the United States’ biggest online booksellers reveals a stark division in the types of scientific literature read by liberals and conservatives. Selective exposure may limit cross-partisan understanding.
11 CitationsSource
#1Marcus R. Munafò (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 67
#2Brian A. Nosek (UVA: University of Virginia)H-Index: 61
Last. John P. A. Ioannidis (Stanford University)H-Index: 151
view all 10 authors...
Improving the reliability and efficiency of scientific research will increase the credibility of the published scientific literature and accelerate discovery. Here we argue for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific process: methods, reporting and dissemination, reproducibility, evaluation and incentives. There is some evidence from both simulations and empirical studies supporting the likely effectiveness of these measures, but their broad adoption by researchers, i...
579 CitationsSource
#1Lex M. Bouter (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 140
#2Joeri K. Tijdink (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 9
Last. Riet ter G (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 45
view all 5 authors...
Codes of conduct mainly focus on research misconduct that takes the form of fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. However, at the aggregate level, lesser forms of research misbehavior may be more important due to their much higher prevalence. Little is known about what the most frequent research misbehaviors are and what their impact is if they occur. A survey was conducted among 1353 attendees of international research integrity conferences. They were asked to score 60 research misbehavio...
35 CitationsSource
#1Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira (University of Porto)H-Index: 23
#2Teresa Magalhães (University of Porto)H-Index: 19
We found the opinion article of Dinis-Oliveira and Magalhaes very pertinent as it highlights the pressure that researchers face to show scientific production indicators. Such pressure for “hunting the article”, one of the most used indicators of scientific production, clearly distorts the ideal of any young scientist, to make scientific discoveries with relevance to humankind. It would be interesting to add some discussion on the association between funding and scientific production, as it is no...
7 CitationsSource
Cited By2
Newest
#1Tamarinde L. Haven (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 2
#2Joeri K. Tijdink (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 9
Last. Lex M. Bouter (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 140
view all 6 authors...
There is increasing evidence that research misbehaviour is common, especially the minor forms. Previous studies on research misbehaviour primarily focused on biomedical and social sciences, and evidence from natural sciences and humanities is scarce. We investigated what academic researchers in Amsterdam perceived to be detrimental research misbehaviours in their respective disciplinary fields. We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. First, survey participants from four disciplin...
1 CitationsSource
#1Emilija Manojlovic-Gacic (University of Belgrade)H-Index: 3
#2Jelena Dotlic (University of Belgrade)H-Index: 6
Last. Milica Skender-Gazibara (University of Belgrade)H-Index: 4
view all 5 authors...
The purpose of this study was to evaluate recognition of pathologists and radiologists as coauthors in case reports in the field of surgical oncology. The MEDLINE database was searched for all full free text case reports involving human material published from April 1, 2011 until March 31, 2016, using search terms: “case report” + “tumors” + “surgery” + “malignant”. The search strategy identified a total of 1427 case reports of which 907 were included in this analysis. Of 807 articles with histo...
Source