Linguistic differences between well‐established and predatory journals: a keyword analysis of two journals in political science
Abstract
Predatory publishing has become a much-discussed and highly visible phenomenon over the past few years. One widespread, but hardly tested, assumption is the idea that articles published in predator...
Paper Details
Title
Linguistic differences between well‐established and predatory journals: a keyword analysis of two journals in political science
Published Date
Jul 1, 2019
Journal
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
259 - 269
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History