Minimally invasive versus conventional surgery of the ascending aorta and root: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Volume: 57, Issue: 1, Pages: 8 - 17
Published: Jun 17, 2019
Abstract
Limited uptake of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the aorta hinders assessment of its efficacy compared to median sternotomy (MS). The objective of this systematic review is to compare operative and perioperative outcomes for MIS versus MS. Online databases Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched from inception until July 2018. Both randomized and observational studies of patients undergoing aortic root, ascending...
Paper Details
Title
Minimally invasive versus conventional surgery of the ascending aorta and root: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published Date
Jun 17, 2019
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
8 - 17
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History