A review of the cognitive basis for human reliability analysis

In the early 1990s, criticism over first-generation human reliability analysis (HRA) models, like THERP, SPAR-H, and ASEP, claimed that these models did not have a cognitive architecture capable of dealing with the human information processing. Later, new methodologies emerged, such as ATHEANA, INTEROPS, OMAR, and PROCRU (USA), CREAM, COSIMO, DYLAM/HERMES and MERMOS (Europe), and SEAMAID, CAMEO, and SYBORG (Japan), which represent a more complex...