Calculating the posterior odds from a single-match DNA database search with hidden assumptions
Abstract
Wixted et al. (2019) addressed the question of how forensic statisticians should advise courts of law about the implications of a single-match DNA database search. The prevailing view in the field is that statisticians should advise courts about the likelihood ratio associated with forensic evidence because it is a purely statistical estimate derived from case-independent measurements (e.g. Neumann et al., 2016). Conversely, they should refrain...
Paper Details
Title
Calculating the posterior odds from a single-match DNA database search with hidden assumptions
Published Date
May 23, 2019
Journal
Volume
18
Issue
2-3
Pages
229 - 234
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History