Objecting to experiments that compare two unobjectionable policies or treatments
Volume: 116, Issue: 22, Pages: 10723 - 10728
Published: May 9, 2019
Abstract
Randomized experiments have enormous potential to improve human welfare in many domains, including healthcare, education, finance, and public policy. However, such "A/B tests" are often criticized on ethical grounds even as similar, untested interventions are implemented without objection. We find robust evidence across 16 studies of 5,873 participants from three diverse populations spanning nine domains-from healthcare to autonomous vehicle...
Paper Details
Title
Objecting to experiments that compare two unobjectionable policies or treatments
Published Date
May 9, 2019
Volume
116
Issue
22
Pages
10723 - 10728
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History