Review paper
Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense
Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 156 - 168
Published: May 8, 2019
Abstract
Effect sizes are underappreciated and often misinterpreted—the most common mistakes being to describe them in ways that are uninformative (e.g., using arbitrary standards) or misleading (e.g., squaring effect-size rs). We propose that effect sizes can be usefully evaluated by comparing them with well-understood benchmarks or by considering them in terms of concrete consequences. In that light, we conclude that when reliably estimated (a critical...
Paper Details
Title
Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense
Published Date
May 8, 2019
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
156 - 168
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History